It might not be covered by DJI warranty however DJI can’t operate to exclude rights that are provided for in consumer law. Lower cycle count chances of replacement would be fair- hard to argue you might not have had reasonable use at 200 cycles however.That means it won't be covered by the DJI Warranty if it is defective. The battery warranty is only good for 6 months and less than 200 flights.
Which US rights are you referring to? Got a link for the OP?It might not be covered by DJI warranty however DJI can’t operate to exclude rights that are provided for in consumer law
No link. I’m simply suggesting it might prove handy for people who aren’t aware to appreciate that manufacturers often rely on the fact that people won’t explore their options. The Federal Trade Commission would be a good place to start.Which US rights are you referring to? Got a link for the OP?
Why do you suggest that the law mandates a longer battery warranty than the manufacturer states?No link. I’m simply suggesting it might prove handy for people who aren’t aware to appreciate that manufacturers often rely on the fact that people won’t explore their options. The Federal Trade Commission would be a good place to start.
I don’t specifically. What I do say is that consumer rights aren’t necessarily limited to those specified in the warranty. For example I had a phantom 3 camera replaced by DJI at 10 months while they tried to argue warranty says 3. I have lost count of the number of instances a manufacturer has made good on things outside warranty. It comes down to what a reasonable consumer might expect having regard to cost, claimed purpose and actual usage (amongst other things). My American friends tell me the consumer protection organisations are similar as on this side of the planet.Why do you suggest that the law mandates a longer battery warranty than the manufacturer states?