I'm watching this situation unfold from over on the other side of the Atlantic, and I truly feel for anyone in the US who has invested time, money and effort in becoming early adopters of this relatively new technology - a lot of whom have also become expert in their chosen fields and have built thriving businesses through hard effort. To see all of them being progressively hung out to dry by the creators of discriminatory legislation is sobering.So, I'm in the process of starting up my company and am looking to purchasing a Mavic 3M multispectral drone system. With H.R. 2864 moving through congress, is it a wise move to make such an investment (over 5K).
No. Do not waste your money at this time. The whack jobs in Congress seem hell bent to show how tough they are on China, and this legislation is a low-hanging fruit slam dunk for their ill-informed constituents.So, I'm in the process of starting up my company and am looking to purchasing a Mavic 3M multispectral drone system. With H.R. 2864 moving through congress, is it a wise move to make such an investment (over 5K).
I wonder what the limit would be and I also how many people will be turning in the drone they crashed years ago for full purchase credit? I could actually piece together dozens of "look like they work" drones Does that mean I hit the lottery? After all if their use is banned I can't very well turn it on for you to check now can I? and the government can't stop these Drones from Flying they can only ask you to stop flying them.And even if it does, that means the U.S. Government has to pay us all of the drones they've bricked.
I hope that you are right. However, none of the politicians want to appear soft on China in a pivotal election year. If the climate was ever right for it to pass, it will be this year.The Countering CCP Drones Act is highly unlikely to pass. I'm still optimistic it won't.
And even if it does, that means the U.S. Government has to pay us all of the drones they've bricked. And I truly believe that single aspects of the act will persuade enough Congress folks to vote no if it makes it to the floor of either house.
They can order DJI to disable the drones through their central servers, effectively bricking them. All that it will take is a couple of keystrokes. If you cannot authenticate your DJI account, your aircraft is a dead piece of plastic.I wonder what the limit would be and I also how many people will be turning in the drone they crashed years ago for full purchase credit? I could actually piece together dozens of "look like they work" drones Does that mean I hit the lottery? After all if their use is banned I can't very well turn it on for you to check now can I? and the government can't stop these Drones from Flying they can only ask you to stop flying them.
DJI is a Chinese Company Why would they assist any other Government to Disable their products? Especially one That pretty much Treats them like they would an enemy of our very ideals.They can order DJI to disable the drones through their central servers, effectively bricking them. All that it will take is a couple of keystrokes. If you cannot authenticate your DJI account, your aircraft is a dead piece of plastic.
So who will give these Local Law enforcement officers the power to enforce Federal law? Surely NOT the FAA Besides Our Local Law enforcement is taxed enough without running around looking for someones illegal RC Drone. Could you just imagine the Market on DJI Shaped Ballons if the police were required to stop every person using a drone that "looked" like a DJI besides "Looked" like A DJI" Is gonna raise all sorts of harassment problems for the already disliked local police force in a court of law.Due to limited FAA enforcement capabilities, we continue to rely on local law enforcement departments to assist with FAA agency matters and at this point, we'll need them more than ever now that this is important for us to chase and it's about time to get serious and this is what we've always wanted. Officers, deputies, constables, marshals, agents, and troopers should contact anyone flying a drone which looks like a DJI model and detain that person until you can identify the drone model.
I don't think a lot of law enforcement will be necessary. As soon as the law passes, if DJI drone are banned on paper from operating in US airspace, as a law-abiding citizen I will self-ground my own drone. I suspect 90% of drone community will comply. That's the beauty of tyranny in a free country.So who will give these Local Law enforcement officers the power to enforce Federal law? Surely NOT the FAA Besides Our Local Law enforcement is taxed enough without running around looking for someones illegal RC Drone. Could you just imagine the Market on DJI Shaped Ballons if the police were required to stop every person using a drone that "looked" like a DJI besides "Looked" like A DJI" Is gonna raise all sorts of harassment problems for the already disliked local police force in a court of law.
In Bakersfield Now the only way to get the police to you is if you have a Madman with a rifle shooting around the street - and even then your gonna wait awhile so hunker down!
There are moving goalposts in the US - so it can be an issue. I see it continuing to be an issue for federal and state contractors. Your 3M would be more likely used in a rural setting with farmers and orchard growers? If that's the scenario, then there might not be much of a problem in that environment.So, I'm in the process of starting up my company and am looking to purchasing a Mavic 3M multispectral drone system. With H.R. 2864 moving through congress, is it a wise move to make such an investment (over 5K).
Obviously I don't speak for the government and it's sad to say but I can almost assure you there will be no government reimbursement program for DJI contraband drones should it end up that way. Perhaps you can find a way to pivot in your business given that you have at least a number of years until this could possibly go into effect.I guess I have the worlds worst timing. I have been a recreational flyer for several years. I decided at the end of 2022 that I was going to turn my hobby into a business. I spent 3 months studying and obtained my FAA remote license. I took out a $20K personal loan and purchased a Mavic 3 and D-RTK2 for mapping and photography work. Also a Mavic 3 Thermal for inspection work. Plus all the extras hard cases, extra batteries, filters, SD cards etc etc. Using the freedom of information act I built a mailing list of all the real estate agents in the state. Printed 1000 flyers to start and business cards. Built a website. Was going to mail the flyers off in batches of 100. Sent the first batch of 100 out. Found out about 2864 that week. So I just put it on pause waiting to find out what happens to the bill. Why put any more time, effort and money into a business that may get completely bricked? Very big letdown.
I was curious about the comments above about the government having to reimburse citizens for the drones if they pass the law. I figured there would be a fund for the government agencies to replace first responder gear (90% of them fly DJI) but I figured the average citizen would get boned?
Does anyone have any information about this reimbursement aspect? I would not feel quite as screwed if I know I can eventually get some of my money back on the drones. I figured they are basically worthless at this point. $15K worth of equipment and the Mavic 3 has maybe 2 hours flight time and the Mavic Thermal has never left the ground. I just turned it on long enough to update the software. They both been sitting in the cases since the 3rd week after purchase.
Like I said, worst frigging timing ever.
~Hutch in Oklahoma
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.