It appears we may finally get to adjudicate the *usage* of drones by the government under legal scrutiny in terms of enforcement in front of a court at the state/local level. Perhaps something like this will attract the attention of the bigger organizations such as the ACLU and The Institute for Justice. We've already touched on the drone's relationship to the first amendment and surveillance and privacy and similar but how about the proper usage of a drone in enforcing the law and the penalties assessed?
Leave it to Cali, the people there voted for this nonsense even though they were told the drones are needed to show up as a first responder on the scene to render aid, and to record crimes in progress for evidence and now they are about to find out. It didn't take long for the government to figure out how to turn those drones against the citizens and violate their rights. No one can say they didn't see this coming. This has to be record in terms of time and how long after it is said "We don't use these drones for anything else...." until someone figured it out that a drone is priceless when it comes to revenue collection, spying, and collect data against anyone.
Let's see what happens here, watch the video or read the article and next time your local police department tells you they need drones so they can respond more quickly, handle the low-level crimes with ease, and back-up officers for officer safety and they want 50 drones pre-positioned in a dozen fixed sites around your city, and drones don't patrol they are dispatched on 911 calls only, think about making sure you set the limits and the guard rails on what you think those drones should be used for. Personally, I think it's as easy as "follow the law, obey the Constitution" and that's a good place to start before you dive into transparency and data retention because let's be honest, the taxpayers are going to pay for those drones, it's inevitable. Our job is to keep the drones and the operators under control so you don't get burned by the predictable and eventual abuse that is inevitable especially when you partner with predatory and aggressive 3rd party private contractors. While this isn't exactly a "drone" case, it should wake people up in terms of capabilities and possibilities. You don't want rogue government law enforcement drones unleashed in your community, only bad things will happen.
dronexl.co
Leave it to Cali, the people there voted for this nonsense even though they were told the drones are needed to show up as a first responder on the scene to render aid, and to record crimes in progress for evidence and now they are about to find out. It didn't take long for the government to figure out how to turn those drones against the citizens and violate their rights. No one can say they didn't see this coming. This has to be record in terms of time and how long after it is said "We don't use these drones for anything else...." until someone figured it out that a drone is priceless when it comes to revenue collection, spying, and collect data against anyone.
Let's see what happens here, watch the video or read the article and next time your local police department tells you they need drones so they can respond more quickly, handle the low-level crimes with ease, and back-up officers for officer safety and they want 50 drones pre-positioned in a dozen fixed sites around your city, and drones don't patrol they are dispatched on 911 calls only, think about making sure you set the limits and the guard rails on what you think those drones should be used for. Personally, I think it's as easy as "follow the law, obey the Constitution" and that's a good place to start before you dive into transparency and data retention because let's be honest, the taxpayers are going to pay for those drones, it's inevitable. Our job is to keep the drones and the operators under control so you don't get burned by the predictable and eventual abuse that is inevitable especially when you partner with predatory and aggressive 3rd party private contractors. While this isn't exactly a "drone" case, it should wake people up in terms of capabilities and possibilities. You don't want rogue government law enforcement drones unleashed in your community, only bad things will happen.
Drone Surveillance Nets $300,000 Fine For California Homeowner Who Says He “Wasn’t Even Home”
A California homeowner faces a staggering $300,000 fine after a city drone recorded illegal fireworks at his property on July 4th—even though he insists he
dronexl.co