- Joined
- Jun 2, 2019
- Messages
- 39
- Reactions
- 12
You can start here for the mount, then search for the Osmo case. I didn't find the latter w/a quick search.
Shapeways Marketplace Update - Shapeways Blog
We wish the circumstances were different, but unfortunately the marketplace won’t be available in the way it existed before July 2024. We understand thiswww.shapeways.com
I can't figure out how it attaches to the bottom of the mavic? Some "clips" that grab a part of the Mavic unbody?You can start here for the mount, then search for the Osmo case. I didn't find the latter w/a quick search.
Shapeways Marketplace Update - Shapeways Blog
We wish the circumstances were different, but unfortunately the marketplace won’t be available in the way it existed before July 2024. We understand thiswww.shapeways.com
Thanks for posting the picture.The mount clamps securely onto the forward underside reinforcement area.
I haven't flown the bottom mount yet as I've been using the top mount for inspection work and capturing look downs of the quad overflying areas with an Insta 360 One X.
I deactivate ALL the sensors when using a bottom mount and rarely run w/the other proximity sensors anytime. Either don't need them or they prevent smooth operation in close proximity work.Not to mention interference with the sensors.
I hand launch much of the time to keep sensors & cooling intakes clear of dust or debris when not using a ground mat. I've flown with the top mount aggressively w/o problem, but yes it is slightly different. The bottom mount should be better than the top. As to why- that's the only way to get an after market camera capability on your drone. For me, it's a 360 camera.This might be a dumb question...but... WHY? This seems like it would be impossible to land (without risky hand catching)... and could throw off the weight of the drone enough to cause stability issues, especially in turbulent conditions?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.