Agree."DJI’s loyal customer base found a glimmer of hope in the details of the ruling. The FCC clarified that previously purchased drones were exempt from this prohibition, allowing current users to continue utilizing their devices without interruption."
When I read this statement, I get the impression it was possible this could have gone another way?
Yes,but care refresh and warranties on current purchases?No word."DJI’s loyal customer base found a glimmer of hope in the details of the ruling. The FCC clarified that previously purchased drones were exempt from this prohibition, allowing current users to continue utilizing their devices without interruption."
When I read this statement, I get the impression it was possible this could have gone another way?
Did they really pose a drone near that ring of fire or is that a composited image?
So if they didn't ban already-approved DJI drones, can they sell them in the US or distribute through other sellers or once they run out of inventory which were already in the channel, they can't order more from DJI?
Which implies that only future production of DJI products present a supposed threat to US national security and commerce etc blah, blah, blah, whereas current models continue to be of acceptable risk? How does that make sense to anyone?Earlier in December, the FCC placed DJI on the covered list. This means there will be no more FCC certifications issued to DJI going forward. In the meantime, everything else DJI in America continues a usual.
I mostly agree with that but it only tells me they have a quick solution on how to take care of any future products but not yet a solid solution on how to deal with the current models.Which implies that only future production of DJI products present a supposed threat to US national security and commerce etc blah, blah, blah, whereas current models continue to be of acceptable risk? How does that make sense to anyone?
Your search for sense in this case is futile!Which implies that only future production of DJI products present a supposed threat to US national security and commerce etc blah, blah, blah, whereas current models continue to be of acceptable risk? How does that make sense to anyone?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.