Drone identification regulation challenged
A petition seeking federal appeals court review of the new FAA regulation governing remote identification of unmanned aircraft could have significant consequences.
www.aopa.org
Very cool! It’s further along than I thought! Hopefully at the very least some of the arcane parts of remoteID will be dialed back.Drone identification regulation challenged
A petition seeking federal appeals court review of the new FAA regulation governing remote identification of unmanned aircraft could have significant consequences.www.aopa.org
I feel like I should donate to this.
It’s not like a license plate. The registration number on your drone is like a license plate. Remote ID is like an ankle bracelet tracker that anyone and everyone can track. This is for both you and the drone.I don’t understand what the suit is arguing against. Can someone help clarify?
Remote ID is like a license plate, right? Why is that (from the press release), “failing to comply with constitutional protections”?
I want to be more informed on this issue, but I find the argument lacking detail.
That was a little different because what the FAA was doing was against the law. The law can be changed and was. This is a constitutional question and the constitution cannot be changed so easily.Why bother? Just like in 2017, Congress will intervene and pass updated laws. You think the FAA is not ready for this?
Current Congress is too busy playing thumbsies and doling out big bucks to the contributors to care about drone people.Why bother? Just like in 2017, Congress will intervene and pass updated laws. You think the FAA is not ready for this?
Ah, that helps sort things for me. Much appreciated.It’s not like a license plate. The registration number on your drone is like a license plate. Remote ID is like an ankle bracelet tracker that anyone and everyone can track. This is for both you and the drone.
The Supreme Court has already ruled that location data is property subject to 4th amendment protection against illegal search and seizure and requires a court order to obtain. The FAA is telling us we need to give that information not just to law enforcement without a warrant but all to any joe able to pick up the signal and with no knowledge it is being taken.
It’s akin to requiring your car to broadcast its location, speed, and heading to anyone with a phone app which no one in this country would accept.