There has been lots of miscommunication or misunderstanding on some key points. The NC statute that has been cited is a civil not a criminal statute. It is intended to give people the right to sue drone operators who fly over their property conducting surveillance without consent. It exists alongside criminal statutes which prohibit things like stalking, harassment, trespass, nuisance, voyeurism, etc. There are many other states that have the same or similar laws which we have discussed on this forum for 3+ years. These statutes generally allow recovery of "actual" damages or liquidated damages per image, but sometimes only if published. Some allow for punitive damages. Most allow for recovery of all legal fees and expenses. Many including NC's allow the plaintiff to seek an injunction barring further overflights. I am not suggesting resort to such laws are for everybody or for anybody in particular. What I am saying is that if someone is flying drones on a regular basis at night over private property and creating noise and disturbance in NC, there is a way to try and find out who is doing it and why, and possibly stop it. The assumption I am making is that there is credible evidence of the overflights and where the drones originate.