AMann
Well-Known Member
Using an argument based on unsupported opinion does not invalidate factual evidence, there are documented incidents of flying objects like kites and other human caused disturbances directly causing loss of young in nesting birds.We have a LOT of bad laws which people ignore all the time. Those people include our own lawmakers who, if you follow headlines the past few years, have decided to ignore certain federal laws. This country's history is full of examples of individuals, groups, and local/state governments willfully ignoring bad laws. Sometimes they pay the price, although oftentimes the enforcement agencies will eventually side with the offender, if the law is stupid enough and if enough people openly oppose it.
I'd agree, however, that this is probably not a law worth risking a lot of money or time trying to defeat, but it is both annoying and -- for parts of it -- stupid.
That’s why some beaches on the Pacific Coast are closed to flying kites and drones during nesting season as gulls have swooped in to take chicks when endangered birds like the snowy plover get scared off their nests, and why bighorn sheep have been chased and scattered by drone pilots before, putting their lambs at risk of mortality due to being separated from their mothers and put at risk by predators.
Wildlife protection laws are not stupid, there are good reasons which have been backed by documented studies and observations why many of them exist.
Last edited: