- Joined
- Jun 21, 2020
- Messages
- 3,977
- Reactions
- 3,963
I received my Freewell gradient filter kit frrom B&H on Friday and just did a very quick test of the lower gradient vs the standard lens cover/filter on the Mini 3 and thought I'd share the first image. I have gradient filters from PolarPro for my Mavic 2 Pro, so I have a little experience with gradients.
IMO the Freewell filter, the one with the least ND has a less graduated progression than the PolarPro set that I have. That was visible as I held both up to the light. The one thing about the PolarPro set is that it is so subtle but effective that I really can't tell that I had a gradient on my M2P at all. Because I'm comparing the two, I think I am biased a bit.
I shots the photos on auto exposure with 0 EV compensation. The one thing about the gradient is that because it darkens the area of the image, when the camera reads the entire area, it averages the exposure out. Without any adjustment on the gradient image, the sky was only slightly darker, but the lower, ground portion was slightly lighter than the non-gradient shot. I adjusted the gradient image to be closer in "exposure" to the buildings and ground of the non-gradient image so what the filter does to the sky is more evident in this comparison and the gradient's effect can be better seen.
I think the filters will be useful, as the purpose is to lessen the impact of a bright sky combined with the ground image area. Are the filters as well produced as the PolarPro? Not in my opinion, but I think they can be very useful a lot of the time when sky and ground appear in the footage at the same time. $39 for a two filter set from B&H.
IMO the Freewell filter, the one with the least ND has a less graduated progression than the PolarPro set that I have. That was visible as I held both up to the light. The one thing about the PolarPro set is that it is so subtle but effective that I really can't tell that I had a gradient on my M2P at all. Because I'm comparing the two, I think I am biased a bit.
I shots the photos on auto exposure with 0 EV compensation. The one thing about the gradient is that because it darkens the area of the image, when the camera reads the entire area, it averages the exposure out. Without any adjustment on the gradient image, the sky was only slightly darker, but the lower, ground portion was slightly lighter than the non-gradient shot. I adjusted the gradient image to be closer in "exposure" to the buildings and ground of the non-gradient image so what the filter does to the sky is more evident in this comparison and the gradient's effect can be better seen.
I think the filters will be useful, as the purpose is to lessen the impact of a bright sky combined with the ground image area. Are the filters as well produced as the PolarPro? Not in my opinion, but I think they can be very useful a lot of the time when sky and ground appear in the footage at the same time. $39 for a two filter set from B&H.