Really - "you might be lucky and have 1080 on the laptop". Here are the specs of my laptop:What vertical resolution is supported by your 13” and 32” laptop and computer monitor screens?? You might be lucky and have 1080 on the laptop. How is 4K going to look better in that scenario? It might even appear worse than 1080 after interpolation and throwing away 3/4 of the encoded pixels.
Alright well 4K isn’t a luxury that might prove wasted in your case- obviously. It seems you are in a small number who have that level of performance in a laptop.Really - "you might be lucky and have 1080 on the laptop". Here are the specs of my laptop:
Dell XPS 13 9380 Specs
Here are the specs of my monitor: View attachment 114355
- 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i7-8565U Processor (8MB Cache, up to 4.6 GHz, 4 cores)
- Intel® UHD Graphics 620
- 13.3″ 4K Ultra HD (3840×2160) InfinityEdge Touch Display
- 16GB LPDDR3 2133MHz
- 2 TB M.2 PCIe NVMe Solid State Drive
- 2 Thunderbolt™ 3 with power delivery and DisplayPort (4 lanes of PCI Express Gen 3)
- 1 USB-C 3.1 with power delivery and DisplayPort
- 1 Headset jack
Ya, I really love it. It's probably not necessary, but it's a nice luxury! On top of that, it is also a touch screen.Alright well 4K isn’t a luxury that might prove wasted in your case- obviously. It seems you are in a small number who have that level of performance in a laptop.
That 13” screen must be like looking at a printed page up close. I do a lot of CAD work and even 5k over 4K (on my 27” displays) is a very noticeable improvement in quality, I can’t imagine how sharp your 13” display must look.
Yes. Some editing applications and some computers have a tough time working with it because to get the higher compression, the playback device must do more work.A very interesting debate with many different points of view ?
Now to something completely different, someone using something other than h.265 in the settings. Is there any reason to use h.264 anymore?
If you can’t see the difference in your viewing device. Save the processor power or need to upgrade the computer.A very interesting debate with many different points of view ?
Now to something completely different, someone using something other than h.265 in the settings. Is there any reason to use h.264 anymore?
Unless you never share, it's really about other people's viewing devices now and in the future.If you can’t see the difference in your viewing device. Save the processor power or need to upgrade the computer.
I have a 4K tv but if I'm honest, I'd struggle to tell the difference between 4K and 1080p when watching movies and so on- part of that is probably that streamed stuff like Netflix isn't stunning quality anyway, perhaps I'd notice the difference on a 4K bluray or something...
But I still tend to shoot 4K with the drone for reasons others have mentioned; stabilization and cropping are easier, and downsampling to 1080p when rendering is likely to reduce noise. The editing downside isn't really an issue if you are willing to lose a bit of time (and storage) up-front for making cache files ("optimized media" in Resolve, for example)
This is a classic example of sour grapes and I see it so much here. Those without the equipment needed to appreciate 4K claim it is (in this case) overrated. 4K and higher are awesome.
True... I was thinking a bit idiosyncratically about my 80” 4K TV.....Unless you never share, it's really about other people's viewing devices now and in the future.
A very interesting debate with many different points of view ?
Now to something completely different, someone using something other than h.265 in the settings. Is there any reason to use h.264 anymore?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.