wasnt just a parked car, it was private property. Suspicious is looking inside a parked vehicle while its on private property...Doubt its real but cant follow your logic. 3 guys on my property one with a (pistol looking onject) and one looking into my vehicle window while parked in my drivway....? I mean, nice call on the car alarm,, it “undoubtably” has no alarm. I dont know about you but if I was going to break in to a car in a highly populated area in broad daylight, I would check to see if the door is open so I dont have to break it and see if there are any blinking lights indicating an alarm and have 2 of my buddies as lookouts or a distraction to the home owner. Your just shooting out wild *** guesses not fact, made to sound make you sound smart... Just sayn, the video is questionable at best, and yes zooming and flying over individuals isnt a recomended practice, but flying your bird around the neighbor is, and If i saw some shady stuff at my neighbors house id stick around too. Rather be safe than sorry and give accountability to the real criminals. Video was eh but your breakdown and logic was the most entertaining
Perhaps you need to get out of the LA sun for awhile...or else buy a nice, protective hat. Your grey matter is getting cooked.
First, the OP did not say it was on his property (as your statement projects) or even that he knew or was familiar with the vehicles, the house, or the occupants therein. Or even that the house was near his. He only said he was flying in his neighborhood - and with a
Mavic 2’s range that could be anywhere up to about 5 miles away - when he saw people breaking into a car (pure conjecture here; no evidence of that), then zoomed in to SEE IF they were breaking into a car (so which is it? Did he see them breaking into a car as he first stated or did he zoom in closer to see if they were breaking into a car as he also stated, thereby contradicting himself?)
And you think 3 people looking into a car on private property - or even on public property, for that matter - gives rise for suspicion? Why? If it’s their car, a friends car, a family members, etc., there are a multitude of reasons why they could be looking into a car. They could be looking for a coat, a book, a cell phone, anything. And if on public property they could be just checking out the vehicle, perhaps because they are in the market to buy one like it, to admire the upholstery or maybe saw a dog in it. Again, the possibilities are endless.
You also say if you saw 3 people on YOUR property looking in YOUR vehicle on YOUR driveway and one had what looked like a gun, that would raise questions in your mind. Well, DUH! Certainly. Who wouldn’t question all of that? But this is not the case here at all; what you say about these factors are mere additions and fabrications to what was stated and are more projections upon the story on your part. Because it was NOT the OP’s property, it was NOT his vehicle, and it was NOT his driveway. Each of these were someone else’s, so your point here is...well...actually, there really is no point. This statement of yours is pointless.
But there is one area where you ARE 100% correct: you do not know about me. If you did, you’d know I wouldn’t initially have an opinion at all about what I’d do if I wanted to break into a car, because I don’t have larceny in my heart. You, however, seem to have already thought out such an occurence. But, if pressed for an answer, I’d have to say I totally disagree with how you would conduct your approach - because I would not want to get caught. Using your method, however, you surely would be.
You say you’d check the door to see if it was locked. Again, the vehicle in question is a late-model vehicle, which means the door locks would not be obvious, the windows are most likely heavily tinted, and so the only way to check to see if the door was open would be to try the door handle - which is stupid, because many newer vehicles will sound the alarm if the door handle is raised when the door is locked. Mistake number #1. Checking for blinking lights is at least a step in the right direction. So I’ll give you that one. But having your compatriots serve as lookouts RIGHT BY THE HOUSE is, again, just stupid. An operative part of the word ”lookouts” is “out.” No one would want a “lookin,” someone near the house to easily be seen by anyone occupying the house. Mistake #2 for you. Mistake #3: Thinking your droogs in crime could serve as distractions, as you suggest, to the homeowner while you commit a crime in the homeowner’s yard. REALLY? Do you actually think 2 unknown men lurking around outside someone’s home would be a reasonable distraction for you while you break into their vehicle? Unless the homeowner is either Helen Keller, Stevie Wonder, or Jose Feliciano I seriously doubt if that would work. Suggestion: whatever your line of work may be, stick to it. A life of crime is not in your cards.
Finally, I did not shoot out “...wild *** guesses, not fact...” to make myself sound smart, as you claim in one sentence. In fact, I made no guesses in my post at all. But based upon that sentence, to you at least, what I said indicates intelligence on my part. So, I thank you for at least noticing the huge gap between you and myself with regards to, well, let’s just say, with regards to issues of intellect. Apparently, you find my demonstration of the English language to be off-putting, which certainly is your right. And it is my right to reply that, in my opinion, your stumbling sentence stating this is clearly not “smart” in the slightest, in any language. I would like to be kind and suggest that you obtain a thesaurus, but I’m afraid you’d head out in search of Jurassic Park to find one.