I agree with you there BUT was he really flying LOS or was he "Flying the camera", one cannot FPV alone you need a spotter. and even tho he has no goggles constant attention to the screen would be the same thing as having goggles.He was on the way to filming a potentially unsafe, illegal flight, but was still likely within VLOS range when he crashed.
Or is there something else we should be looking for here?
We will never know. But, I'd have to think he was flying LOS (or looking elsewhere) since it was easy to see the tree was fast approaching on the remote controller screen. Either way, it's an easy mistake to make when flying LOS.BUT was he really flying LOS or was he "Flying the camera"
I'm not sure anything illegal happened in that specific video. But, yes, many people in general support long range flight videos as they probably aren't aware it's illegal. Many people do not understand the rules well.Then, all the comments seem to support illegal activity
And yet his video seems to dispute that statement.Dustin Dunnill is far from being an idiot.
Per section 107.31:Do you have to be able to see the drone, itself, or the area the drone is in?
#3 requires VLOSPer section 107.31:
(1) Know the unmanned aircraft's location;
(2) Determine the unmanned aircraft's attitude, altitude, and direction of flight;
(3) Observe the airspace for other air traffic or hazards; and
(4) Determine that the unmanned aircraft does not endanger the life or property of another.
Unfortunately, we can't negotiate with the FAA on how we believe a screen can be used. That's why they always require VLOS when operating an unmanned aircraft.1, 2, 4 can be determined from the screen
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.