The Editor
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,026
- Reactions
- 810
Hence my post above!When you have two compass sensors which do not agree, how do you know which is correct?
For a true redundant system you need three of everything.
Hence my post above!When you have two compass sensors which do not agree, how do you know which is correct?
Yes it will because it will initialise and accept it's attitude as zero offset. Only when it was airborne would the flight controller know that erroneous data was being received that didn't correspond to aircraft change of attitude.Yeah. But a stuck gyro accelerometer won't let you take off.
Dual compass and IMU made its debut on the P4It's a dual compass that's new and should prevent the flyaways, not the dual GPS (That's been around for a while)
When you have two compass sensors which do not agree, how do you know which is correct?
Lucky you.....
For now.... [emoji14]I guess I'm just lucky too.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Although dual GPS is not really to do with preventing fly-aways, it is simply used for better positional accuracy.
Now for the price point DJI cannot give true redundancy which requires three of each module. That way a comparison can be made between each of the three and if one starts giving differing data to the other two it can be switched out the system by the flight controller and all is well. With only having two of each sensor, if one gives some strange data there is no real way of knowing which of the two is feeding the erroneous information to the flight controller. So, no, dual modules DOES NOT mean no more fly-aways. However, DJI would have written in algorithms to the flight controller that will look at the data coming from the accelerometers and gyros whilst comparing the attitude of the aircraft with correlation to stick input. If the two do not agree, the erroneous IMU would be ignored.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.