Man shot another over drone

[Qoncussion]

I'm lost here... The article posted above starts off saying that the dispute was most likely over the fact that the recipient of the bullet, hit the shooter's wife with a bottle. Then breaks out into wild speculation over a drone:

"But the two also *possibly* argued over Neith's use of a drone in the area where they live.....

*If* the drone did play a role.........."

*possibly
*if

The article then spends the next few paragraphs *speculating* about the uninvolved drone. This story has absolutely nothing to do with a drone, but clearly shows what a joke the media has become.

 

[Classic flyer]

I'm lost here... The article posted above starts off saying that the dispute was most likely over the fact that the recipient of the bullet, hit the shooter's wife with a bottle. Then breaks out into wild speculation over a drone:

"But the two also *possibly* argued over Neith's use of a drone in the area where they live.....

*If* the drone did play a role.........."

*possibly
*if

The article then spends the next few paragraphs *speculating* about the uninvolved drone. This story has absolutely nothing to do with a drone, but clearly shows what a joke the media has become.

Say it ain't so

 

[Tom-Air]

Obviously another argument for more gun control..lol

Oh geez, yeah the gun jumped right out and shot the man...NO!

 

[Simmo]

I'm lost here... The article posted above starts off saying that the dispute was most likely over the fact that the recipient of the bullet, hit the shooter's wife with a bottle. Then breaks out into wild speculation over a drone:

"But the two also *possibly* argued over Neith's use of a drone in the area where they live.....

*If* the drone did play a role.........."

*possibly
*if

The article then spends the next few paragraphs *speculating* about the uninvolved drone. This story has absolutely nothing to do with a drone, but clearly shows what a joke the media has become.

Modern Media Motto: 'Never let the truth get in the way of a good story...'

 

[Prmath]

I'm lost here... The article posted above starts off saying that the dispute was most likely over the fact that the recipient of the bullet, hit the shooter's wife with a bottle. Then breaks out into wild speculation over a drone:

"But the two also *possibly* argued over Neith's use of a drone in the area where they live.....

*If* the drone did play a role.........."

*possibly
*if

The article then spends the next few paragraphs *speculating* about the uninvolved drone. This story has absolutely nothing to do with a drone, but clearly shows what a joke the media has become.

Wouldn’t it be nice to just get STRAIGHT no BS facts......