Mavic 3 vs 2 Field Of View Comparison?

[RC5728]

Hi,

Does anyone have any photos comparing the field of view on the Mavic 3 vs 2?

I'm hoping to upgrade to the Mavic 3 soon, and I read the field of view is wider than the M2, but I haven't been able to find any pictures that demonstrate how much of a difference there is.

Thanks

 

[Meta4]

Does anyone have any photos comparing the field of view on the Mavic 3 vs 2?

Since 28mm and 24 mm lenses have been used in photography for decades, it's easy to find examples of the difference between their coverage
Like this:

Or more details here:

24mm vs 28mm: Full Comparison with Photos!

Compare how the 24mm vs 28mm focal lengths perform in different fields of photography with this detailed article that also contains lots of example photos to illustrate the differences.

www.lapseoftheshutter.com

 

[RC5728]

Thanks, so there's no noticeable difference in lens distortion / fisheye effect with the wider FOV?

 

[Filmarik]

Thanks, so there's no noticeable difference in lens distortion / fisheye effect with the wider FOV?

What fisheye effect? Never heard of fisheye effect on 24mm lens and I've been shooting with 24mm lens on my DSLR for 20 years. Fisheye lenses are usually around 8mm, AFAIK.

 

[Meta4]

Thanks, so there's no noticeable difference in lens distortion / fisheye effect with the wider FOV?

Not at all.
I see that if you google it, you may find someone used that expression, but whoever wrote that has no knowledge at all of what fisheye lenses actually are.
The DJI lens is a normal rectilinear wideangle.
All straight lines in your subject will be rendered straight with the Mavic 3 wideangle lens.
It's a fine lens that just sees a little wider than that on the Mavic 2 pro.

Do you see any "distortion or fisheye" effect here?

Or here?