Mont Saint-Michel Normandy France:
This footage is with Mavic 2 Pro, other channel footage is Phantom 3 Advanced.
I always thought that would be such an amazing place to live. Great video!Mont Saint-Michel Normandy France: This footage is with Mavic 2 Pro, other channel footage is Phantom 3 Advanced.
You captured the Mont St Michelle well with the singular exception of failing to ever show the top of the spire. I was frustrated in trying to see if you ever decided to back off or fly higher to show the top of the spire. It never happened.Mont Saint-Michel Normandy France: This footage is with Mavic 2 Pro, other channel footage is Phantom 3 Advanced.
You and I agree on the lack of color Dale but in all fairness, there is one CU shot of St. Michael almost at the end, at the 8:02 mark and there are several wide shots that include the spire. Oh, we also agree on the omelettes, we also had them when we were there...C'est tres delicieux!You captured the Mont St Michelle well with the singular exception of failing to ever show the top of the spire. I was frustrated in trying to see if you ever decided to back off or fly higher to show the top of the spire. It never happened.
In addition, the color grading was totally absent in the drone views. It looked entirely like a RAW file or Log file that had not been graded. The colors of the other video camera from ground views really shows how beautiful the colors should have been.
I too, had the opportunity to spend a night there and have the famous omelette on the ground street. It was fantastic. There were no drones many years ago when my wife and I were there.
Dale
Miami
I appreciate your feedback. I had over 20 video clips of Mont Saint-Michel from that day shot as Dlog. I thought by shooting in LOG I would have better dynamic range. It was taking so much time to color grade I questioned if it was worth the effort. But no – the footage was not straight out of the camera. The haze was one problem, and I had to eliminate some footage because the haze was so bad.I was fortunate enough to visit Le Mont Saint Michel in the mid 1980's when there were fewer tourists. It was one of the most amazing experiences of my life. My wife and I even stayed on the island in a small inn. So, I enjoyed your video but it did look like all the aerial video was ungraded. In fact, it looked like LOG video straight out of the camera. Any artistic reason why you went for that look?
Let’s cut the new forum member a little slack. It was a nice effort at a travel vlog.You captured the Mont St Michelle well with the singular exception of failing to ever show the top of the spire. I was frustrated in trying to see if you ever decided to back off or fly higher to show the top of the spire. It never happened.
In addition, the color grading was totally absent in the drone views. It looked entirely like a RAW file or Log file that had not been graded. The colors of the other video camera from ground views really shows how beautiful the colors should have been.
I too, had the opportunity to spend a night there and have the famous omelette on the ground street. It was fantastic. There were no drones many years ago when my wife and I were there.
Dale
Miami
Mont Saint-Michel Normandy France: This footage is with Mavic 2 Pro, other channel footage is Phantom 3 Advanced.
It is really a beautiful place. Want to go there since I was younger. I plan to visit in September. I heard that drone are not allowed anymore in a radius of 5km.I appreciate your feedback. I had over 20 video clips of Mont Saint-Michel from that day shot as Dlog. I thought by shooting in LOG I would have better dynamic range. It was taking so much time to color grade I questioned if it was worth the effort. But no – the footage was not straight out of the camera. The haze was one problem, and I had to eliminate some footage because the haze was so bad.
I created two versions of this video for no other reason than to see which one I liked better. One rendered as a .mov file and the other as .mp4 which I posted on Vimeo. However, I preformed color grading on both versions. The one on Vimeo I used a LUT that was intended for the DJI camera. So my guess is you would prefer the one on Vimeo at this link:
I did not like initial LUT result as it just didn't seem real – so I had to tweak the saturation and some of the color parameters. Still, I like the .mov version better because it looked more natural at least to me.
It is really a beautiful place. I plan to visit it for so long. I just learned that now drones are not allowed in the area. And getting permission is close to impossible.Mont Saint-Michel Normandy France: This footage is with Mavic 2 Pro, other channel footage is Phantom 3 Advanced.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.