More worries than DJI drone bans

[AnzacJack]

 

[Cafguy]

When my mother was born in the 40's.....no one in the world but a very few, knew what strontium 90 was. It was rare.
In the 50's they started testing Nuclear weapons.
Now everyone on the planet has a bit of Strontium 90 in their system.

 

[offtheback]

When my mother was born in the 40's.....no one in the world but a very few, knew what strontium 90 was. It was rare.
In the 50's they started testing Nuclear weapons.
Now everyone on the planet has a bit of Strontium 90 in their system.

I light up the night!

 

[Topo]

What could possibly be worth more testing? The current destructive known capabilities of present day devices are many times what was used in wwII, and could wipe out everything in a matter of hours. A far more effective strategy would be to invest in protection systems instead of bigger bombs. As Cafguy said, do we really need more strontium 90 in our environment?

 

[orionshooter]

I’d be more worried if i could understand or even believe what the man says. Always had a hard time with both.

 

[BlueHeeler]

Nuclear bombs good, Drones bad.

 

[KB9Radio]

Elect a showman, expect a show. My apologies to the other countries monitoring this fourm, we'll get back to normal someday. Till then just enjoy the show I guess.

 

[BlueHeeler]

What could possibly be worth more testing? The current destructive known capabilities of present day devices are many times what was used in wwII, and could wipe out everything in a matter of hours. A far more effective strategy would be to invest in protection systems instead of bigger bombs. As Cafguy said, do we really need more strontium 90 in our environment?

I don't believe the "yield" of a device is what they are want to improve, but the delivery systems. We have complete deterrence anyway, subs down deep anywhere in the world, but of course, systems do require maintenance and upgrades.
Destroying the surface of Earth many times over is not good enough for some.