ND PL Filter question (with pic) help please

[itsneedtokno]

In fact the result will often be subjectively superior, simply because shorter individual exposures often have less sensor induced noise.

So this is something I didn't know/think about...
I love learning. ???

Thank you for that tidbit of information!

The effect the ND is assisting you in reproducing (time lapse motion blur) is well known and predates digital imaging and drones.

My photography experience started with a Minolta 35mm on Bulb setting, capturing lightning with my grandfather when I was about 8 (a little over 20 years ago). One of the only childhood memories I have left. That, and him teaching me to drive standard transmission. ?

I have loved photography as long as I can remember. ?





Sorry if my posts seemed brash or rude, I wasn't trying to come across that way. I was confused, and like I said, love learning.

Thanks for the tip on the stacked photos.
Regarding that though, how would I get the same stretch? More photos? Larger stacks?

By this I mean...
If I 3-AEB at 1/30th, that's roughly 1 second of exposure. To get the same amount without a filter (at 1/100 for example) I would need 100 frames, yes?