After messing around with 100 combinations of settings and using ND filters and endless grading in Adobe premiere and then looking at lots of other peoples videos I have come to my personal conclusion. Everyone's opinion will be different but for me it comes down to two simple things as to if the mavics can take good enough pro video.
1) It's a good enough camera if I can choose the conditions that I will be filming under. By that I mean the composition and angles of the subjects that I want to film, the time of day and the amount of sunlight and then film each part that I need in a way that works within the cameras limitations. When I do that the final video edit is not bad at all.
2) The video is almost never going to be good enough if someone was to say to me film this tomorrow at 3pm and I want you to fly by this church and then pan the mountain over there with the sky in the background etc etc. No it just does not work! The lack of dynamic range along with no aperture adjustment and the finicky focus just make shooting acceptable footage on demand almost impossible unless I was to luck into favorable conditions or a person who is not going to know mediocre footage from good footage or maybe does not care.
So IMHO it's a good enough camera for doing what I feel like doing so long as I have plenty of time to go back to a location at different times to shoot different sections and then take lots of video and edit out most of the stuff that just does not look good enough.
Would that be feasible on a paid event?
I don't know how many people have come to the same conclusion but that's my personal verdict on the Mavic for pro video work.
Rob
1) It's a good enough camera if I can choose the conditions that I will be filming under. By that I mean the composition and angles of the subjects that I want to film, the time of day and the amount of sunlight and then film each part that I need in a way that works within the cameras limitations. When I do that the final video edit is not bad at all.
2) The video is almost never going to be good enough if someone was to say to me film this tomorrow at 3pm and I want you to fly by this church and then pan the mountain over there with the sky in the background etc etc. No it just does not work! The lack of dynamic range along with no aperture adjustment and the finicky focus just make shooting acceptable footage on demand almost impossible unless I was to luck into favorable conditions or a person who is not going to know mediocre footage from good footage or maybe does not care.
So IMHO it's a good enough camera for doing what I feel like doing so long as I have plenty of time to go back to a location at different times to shoot different sections and then take lots of video and edit out most of the stuff that just does not look good enough.
Would that be feasible on a paid event?
I don't know how many people have come to the same conclusion but that's my personal verdict on the Mavic for pro video work.
Rob
Last edited: