- Joined
- Dec 12, 2017
- Messages
- 128
- Reactions
- 38
- Age
- 54
Just a follow-up, I did pick up the Q500, at a good price, but to make it “like new”, I’d have to replace a motor and come up with a gimbal clamp. The treads are shot on one motor, but it is flyable for now.
What I suspected is true, the Q500 with the integrated display is far superior to the MP controller, from a usability standpoint. I would absolutely love to be able to use the Q500 controller with the MP. There is a physical slider for the speed control, another for the gimbal control (much easier to use than the wheel for the MP gimbal pitch), the connection upon startup is quick, and the rugged switches give some confidence that the craft will comply with commands.
The MP user interface has many more options and greater flexibility than the Q500 controller display, and the MP is FAR, FAR more stable than the Q500 in flight. With that said, the photo/video quality is a draw, with each having its advantages.
The charger was the weak point in my kit, so it was another $
$50+ for a new 2-battery charger, and 3rd-party Q500 batteries seem to have flooded the market, leaving the end-user to find a crap-shoot of good and bad batteries. I picked up one POS battery from Amazon, and am in the middle of trying to get the supplier to take the bad battery back.
I still consider the Q500 to be the “brute” between it and the MP, but the image quality is still great on the Q500. If the transportability and precision of position were never an issue, I’d rather fly the Q500, because of the controller. If I need to fly within a few feet of an object, and/or transport the craft in a backpack, it will be the MP.
What I suspected is true, the Q500 with the integrated display is far superior to the MP controller, from a usability standpoint. I would absolutely love to be able to use the Q500 controller with the MP. There is a physical slider for the speed control, another for the gimbal control (much easier to use than the wheel for the MP gimbal pitch), the connection upon startup is quick, and the rugged switches give some confidence that the craft will comply with commands.
The MP user interface has many more options and greater flexibility than the Q500 controller display, and the MP is FAR, FAR more stable than the Q500 in flight. With that said, the photo/video quality is a draw, with each having its advantages.
The charger was the weak point in my kit, so it was another $
$50+ for a new 2-battery charger, and 3rd-party Q500 batteries seem to have flooded the market, leaving the end-user to find a crap-shoot of good and bad batteries. I picked up one POS battery from Amazon, and am in the middle of trying to get the supplier to take the bad battery back.
I still consider the Q500 to be the “brute” between it and the MP, but the image quality is still great on the Q500. If the transportability and precision of position were never an issue, I’d rather fly the Q500, because of the controller. If I need to fly within a few feet of an object, and/or transport the craft in a backpack, it will be the MP.