The drone market has been slowing down for some time now (and the camera sensor market even more so) which is partially why I wouldn't be optimistic about significant upgrades for the Mavic 3. The original Mavic Pro was impressive in taking most of the Phantom 4's technology and putting it in a much smaller, lighter drone and then the Mavic 2 series was mostly a refinement with better flight time, more sensors and onboard storage but the main improvement was the camera module adding either a zoom or a larger 1in sensor over the original.
In terms of improving the pro I doubt they'd go up a size to a 4/3 sensor (although I'd very much liked to be proved wrong on that) because they're up against physics and while they could use the newer stacked version of the Sony 1in sensor which would offer better framerates but other than that has the same resolution and similar iso and dynamic range performance. They can't do much to significantly extend the flight time or speed either aside from incremental improvements and refinements.
There will of course be improvements in a Mavic 3 but I can't see them being game changing ones that are going to incite buyer's remorse apart from possibly much better flight automation, looking at your three to four month claim the original Mavic pro at four years old should be a complete dinosaur by now but it's not, its specs are only slightly behind current models. If it wasn't for the Mavic 2's much bigger 1in sensor I'd still be flying an original Mavic because while the other Mavic 2 improvements are welcome, they're nowhere near enough to justify the upgrade. When talking about feature wise I'm meaning genuine improvements and not marketing ones like the Mavic Air 2's 48MP sensor (which in reality is a 12MP sensor with some computational benefits) or the pointless 6K/8K video modes offered by the Autel series which are not beneficial on such limited hardware.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.