Oh no, old man, it wasn't you that was demotivating, at all. Your reply were great and welcome. I meant it was the industry regulators that are demotivating, at least to me, to bother. It should be so much simpler.
There are categories with sub categories, there are drone classes that dont even exist yet, legacy devices that nobody knows if they will be allowed to be used in specific category, except a low one (
A3)
There are flyer IDs, and operator IDs
Different certificates
A2 CofC, GCV, Operation Authorisations, PDRA, OSC, STS, legacy certificates like PFCO
Different agencies with different responsibilities, CAA, Not EASA now because of Brexit, NAA, (maybe NAA is the same as the CAA)
UK EU rules dont match USA rules.
Why not make the certificate names match the category names, GCV, why not call it "Specific Category Certificate SCC"
And I dont know the half of it.
I dread to even contemplate how the police, police this, they cant possibly know the rules well enough when they are called to drone situation?
I can see why its got into a mess, UK leaving EU, Drones (UAS) being relatively new and evolving, different organisations involved, and its good its being sorted out, but the class thing and legacy thing, that is a big mistake. As it stands now, I cant see how I can justify a drone for commercial use, when come January its useless and worth a lot less.
Im assuming all legal drones in the UK have a CE mark, so I would think to retrospectively class some of the newer 'legacy' drones or the older more expensive drones, would be possible.
If not then there must be some major manufacturing process that makes a 'class' drone more safe than a legacy drone.
Sorry for the rant, I know im very late to the whole discussion, and you've all discussed it to death already.