Photo Hunter
Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2019
- Messages
- 13
- Reactions
- 4
- Age
- 63
The difference in RAW vs JPEG is that a RAW image will always need to be developed in the digital darkroom (LightRoom or equivalent) to get the most out of the image. A JPEG doesn't necessarily and will usually have any sort of in camera presets (sharpness, contrast, saturation, etc.) applied to the output image. You can also push the developing of a RAW file more than you can a JPEG without wrecking the image.I do shoot in iso100, shooting in raw + jpeg. (Trying to see the difference)
Mainly i would lower the highlights, and higher the shadows. Like those photo i posted. Any advice on these?
Noted on sharpness and contrast!
Thks for all advices pal, will take note of it on my next outing!
Many thanks!
By the way, your sunsets looks really great!
RE pulling down highlights and pushing up shadows: Remember that it is better to over expose the entire image by a little and pull the highlights down than it is to go the other way as increasing exposure in LightRoom amplifies noise in the image. If your sky looks good in your unedited RAW file, you are under exposing the shadows too much. With my M2P, I find that I can shoot at +2/3 - +1 exposure value and still not over expose the highlights so much that I can't get the sky looking good in post & that's the same way I approach shooting sunrise/set with my Nikon or Sony cameras.
And the best advise I can give you regarding the photos above is don't shoot the sun when it's that high in the sky. The first one is not bad at all, just needs some tweaking. Here is a quick edit of that image, done in LightRoom:
(ETA) A very wise photographer once told me "you are supposed to shoot what the sun's light does to a subject, not shoot the sun". Translated, if you shoot with the sun to your back, you will have an easier time creating nice images free from grain, etc. as long as you get your exposure right.