DJI Mavic, Air and Mini Drones
Friendly, Helpful & Knowledgeable Community
Join Us Now

The camera on the air is noticeably better than the pro.

JoshuaCarlton

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Messages
280
Reactions
298
Age
50
I have only had a chance to film a few times but I am happy to see the pulsing and high noise issues resolved with the Mavic Air. Unfortunately youtube compression has some pretty rough degradation as the footage looks very impressive straight out of the camera. This was filmed in Normal mode 0-0-0. I added a light grade in Luma fusion. I hope you guys are enjoying this amazing drone as much as me.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Wow, very nice!
Thank you, I am very impressed with the air. I have purchase pretty much all of DJI's consumer drones and this is quickly becoming my favorite. Don't get me wrong the P4P is amazing but to be honest I don't thing your average youtube watcher could really tell the difference at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grindeddown
I think that allot of us used to blame the Mavic Pro "smears" "clusters", "blobs" and "watercolor" effect on it's 60Mbp/s h.264 compression. Although, this certainly does add it's own problems, I think the "first" cause of the issue is very crude temporal noise reduction processing. This Ambarella A9-A1 image processor dates all the way back GoPro Hero 3! This camera had the exact same "smearing" that we see with the Mavic Pro. I think this A9-A1 chip should have been taken off the market YEARS ago. Ambarella has since replaced it with at least two times with newer designs. Unfortunately DJI bought that chip for the Mavic Pro during the R&D phase and were stuck with it thereafter. DJI has even stated that as soon as the Mavic was finished, they went back to the drawing board the very next day.

The Mavic Air today benefits from the same Ambarella H1 chip that the Phantom 4 Pro uses. And, although it's still the same tiny noisy 1/2.3 sensor, the temporal noise reduction (noise identification process spanning across multiple frames) is FAR better and more efficient than that original A9-A1 chip. in my years of careful noise reduction processing in post, that's what I see as more than half of the problem going on. When you create a bad noise print or profile, this is the effect that you get. Especially when you try to cancel it out too aggressively. You get "blobs" across multiple frames.

Yeah,...it's true that the Air's 100mbp/s sure helps the situation much more than that ridicules 60mbp/s did.

That A9-A1 is 100% dead today. Is it possible that the Mavic Pro was the last imaging device to ever use it?
 
Last edited:
I think that allot of us used to blame the Mavic Pro "smears" "clusters", "blobs" and "watercolor" effect on it's 60Mbp/s h.264 compression. Although, this certainly does add it's own problems, I think the "first" cause of the issue is very crude temporal noise reduction processing. This Ambarella A9-A1 image processor dates all the way back GoPro Hero 3! This camera had the exact same "smearing" that we see with the Mavic Pro. I think this A9-A1 chip should have been taken off the market YEARS ago. Ambarella has since replaced it with at least two times with newer designs. Unfortunately DJI bought that chip for the Mavic Pro during the R&D phase and were stuck with it thereafter. DJI has even stated that as soon as the Mavic was finished, they went back to the drawing board the very next day.

The Mavic Air today benefits from the same Ambarella H1 chip that the Phantom 4 Pro uses. And, although it's still the same tiny noisy 1/2.3 sensor, the temporal noise reduction (noise identification process spanning across multiple frames) is FAR better and more efficient than that original A9-A1 chip. in my years of careful noise reduction processing in post, that's what I see as more than half of the problem going on. When you create a bad noise print or profile, this is the effect that you get. Especially when you try to cancel it out too aggressively. You get "blobs" across multiple frames.

Yeah,...it's true that the Air's 100mbp/s sure helps the situation much more than that ridicules 60mbp/s did.

That A9-A1 is 100% dead today. Is it possible that the Mavic Pro was the last imaging device to ever use it?
Thanks for all of that detailed info!:)
 

DJI Drone Deals

New Threads

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
134,481
Messages
1,595,508
Members
163,010
Latest member
slus
Want to Remove this Ad? Simply login or create a free account