- Joined
- Oct 25, 2017
- Messages
- 176
- Reactions
- 108
- Age
- 67
I remember reading that using the Mavic Pro in a pinch as a stabilized handheld camera didn't work very well, mostly because the gimbal didn't work very well when used in that way. But the Air's gimbal is better, the field of view is wider, and with its smaller size it should be easier to hold as a camera. I wonder how realistic it is to use it instead of a gopro style camera on a gimbal in situations like hiking. Obviously there are drawbacks such as lack of sound recording, narrower pov, and, especially, much shorter battery life, but I can see it as a viable option if you want to do something like supplementing your drone shots of a hike with a few closeup pov shots and shots in jungley areas like we have here in Hawaii, with multiple obstacles.
So, have any Air owners tried this? Is the battery life a lot better when props are not on? How well does the gimbal smooth out walking?
So, have any Air owners tried this? Is the battery life a lot better when props are not on? How well does the gimbal smooth out walking?