100MP and 25MP DNG please

[Filmarik]

Can someone post a link to a few DNG samples from the 28mm camera, please. Taken in both 100 and 25 MP modes and in 4:3 full frame ratio. Preferably shots of a daytime citiscape.

 

[KS-6]

Nice! You broke the seal, haha!

 

[Meta4]

Can someone post a link to a few DNG samples from the 28mm camera, please. Taken in both 100 and 25 MP modes and in 4:3 full frame ratio. Preferably shots of a daytime citiscape.

I found some here:

Dji Mavic 4 Pro review from Pro Photographer (+download RAW samples)

Buy DJI Mavic 4 Pro from dji.com...

kaupokalda.com

btw Although the main camera has a 4/3 sensor, the images that it produces have a 3:2 aspect ratio, not 4:3.

 

[Filmarik]

I found some here:

Dji Mavic 4 Pro review from Pro Photographer (+download RAW samples)

Buy DJI Mavic 4 Pro from dji.com...

kaupokalda.com

btw Although the main camera has a 4/3 sensor, the images that it produces have a 3:2 aspect ratio, not 4:3.

Thanks for the link. 3:2 ratio?? This is not good. The 28mm is already a drawback for me and now 3:2 ratio which crops top and bottom of the frame and further narrows the vertical field of view. Why would they do that? Maybe the extreme corners of the 28mm lens are not sharp enough?? For architectural shooters the full 4:3 ratio would at least capture more vertically, given the already narrower field of view from the 28mm lens, and allow us to crop the sky to get the desired perspective of the building.

 

[Meta4]

3:2 ratio?? This is not good.

Is that a problem when you are shooting a full frame SLR?

Why would they do that?

That's a question for the technical people at DJI, but my guess is there's a good reason for it.

 

[KS-6]

It looks like his 28 cam is de-centered, soft to the right. Bummer about the 10 degree tilt limit on vertical mode, makes sense given the gimbal design.

Glad to see these, less of an improvement from the Mavic 3 Pro than I would have thought...

 

[Filmarik]

Is that a problem when you are shooting a full frame SLR?

That's a question for the technical people at DJI, but my guess is there's a good reason for it.

It is not a problem when shooting with SLR because I can choose as wide angle as I need and I have TS-E lenses to adjust the angle of view and keep the buildings straight. I thought that taking full advantage of full 4:3 sensor would be good to have. No doubt the technical people at DJI have a good reason for this forced crop-in. But that decision makes this drone even less appealing to me.

 

[Filmarik]

It looks like his 28 cam is de-centered, soft to the right. Bummer about the 10 degree tilt limit on vertical mode, makes sense given the gimbal design.

Glad to see these, less of an improvement from the Mavic 3 Pro than I would have thought...

I only downloaded the first photo of the castle with few churches around, the 25MP version. I personally do not see ANY improvement in IQ compared to my M3P photos. If anything I see degradation. The microdetails look worse.Tree foliage has the same strange look like the A3S photos. And the color bleeds through sharp edges of buildings creating this weird effect which looks like a nasty CA, exactly as is the case with the A3S photos.To get to the level of sharpness I am getting from my good old M3P I need to significantly increase the USM values in Lr but then the details look kind of weird and unnatural.

My summary of M4P
The 28mm lens, the 3:2 forced crop factor and now the above described impression from processing the DNG 25MP image......
I have to admit that I was very tempted but it increasingly looks like that I am sticking with my good old M3P for foreseeable future. It might well be the last drone from DJI with not QB sensor and to be honest I am not impressed at all when looking at what is coming out of these QB sensors. They might be great for shooting video but for photography not so.
Thanks for posting the link to the samples, much appreciated. By doing so you have saved me $$$

 

[KS-6]

I only downloaded the first photo of the castle with few churches around, the 25MP version. I personally do not see ANY improvement in IQ compared to my M3P photos. If anything I see degradation. The microdetails look worse.Tree foliage has the same strange look like the A3S photos. And the color bleeds through sharp edges of buildings creating this weird effect which looks like a nasty CA, exactly as is the case with the A3S photos.To get to the level of sharpness I am getting from my good old M3P I need to significantly increase the USM values in Lr but then the details look kind of weird and unnatural.

My summary of M4P
The 28mm lens, the 3:2 forced crop factor and now the above described impression from processing the DNG 25MP image......
I have to admit that I was very tempted but it increasingly looks like that I am sticking with my good old M3P for foreseeable future. It might well be the last drone from DJI with not QB sensor and to be honest I am not impressed st all when looking at what is coming put from these QB sensors. They might be great for shooting video but for photographers not so.
Thanks for posting the link to the samples, much appreciated. By doing so you have saved me $$$

I have the Creator Combo and a spare battery on pre-order order and depending how things go with that and if the cameras are properly centered, the top speed and longer flight time alone could still be reason enough to keep it.

I am often hauling my drones into really remote areas and then have to fly in sport mode to my subjects to photograph them so longer flight times with faster to and from are pretty good considerations for what I need it to do.

In some ways, it's good it is a pre-order that way I can continue to read reports like this.

 

[Filmarik]

I have the Creator Combo and a spare battery on pre-order order and depending how things go with that and if the cameras are properly centered, the top speed and longer flight time alone could still be reason enough to keep it.

I am often hauling my drones into really remote areas and then have to fly in sport mode to my subjects to photograph them so longer flight times with faster to and from are pretty good considerations for what I need it to do.

In some ways, it's good it is a pre-order that way I can continue to read reports like this.

There are obvious benefits this new M4P brings but for me most of them are not important for my work. The flight time of M3P is plenty enough, the spinning gimbal is a "one-trick pony" IMHO and all the spinning shots flooding YT atm will wear out pretty quickly. The vertical video is nice but if these videos are intended mostly for instagram who needs 6K for that?? I have done many by simply cropping in post. Anyway, these are just a few of my thoughts