What country are you in? Are you watching it on a TV, computer monitor, ipad?I was testing 24fps and 30fps around my house and noticed that 24fps was significantly stuttery on the lower part of the video.
Anyone else have that?
Computer monitor. USA
If only part of the video is different, it could be a sign of signal break up from weak transmission, compression overload, or even a faulty memory card. Without seeing your video, I'm guessing. Stutter with 24 fps comes from panning or horizontal motion and a fast shutter speed. 24 fps is not full resolution time. A slower shutter speed (1/50) will blur the image and hide the large increments of motion. So if a car was speeding across part of the frame, that would stutter and not the rest of the image.I was testing 24fps and 30fps around my house and noticed that 24fps was significantly stuttery on the lower part of the video.
Anyone else have that?
everyone else has thatI was testing 24fps and 30fps around my house and noticed that 24fps was significantly stuttery on the lower part of the video.
Anyone else have that?
24fps was lowest acceptable rate for good audio, before sound, silent film ran much slower. I also prefer shooting 30-60 fps. You can still render down in post to 24 fps if needed.everyone else has that
24fps was adopted by the industry because it was cheaper than 30 fps when film was used.
24 FPS was the lowest acceptable rate for believable movement.
I actually prefer 60 fps, but it can seem too smooth/slow.
If I remember correctly, silent film was pretty stuttery24fps was lowest acceptable rate for good audio, before sound, silent film ran much slower. I also prefer shooting 30-60 fps. You can still render down in post to 24 fps if needed.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.