Another Handbrake Video

bronze661 · Nov 29, 2019

shot in 2.7 k rendered into 1080 uploaded to youtube in 12 minutes instead of an hour and 38 minutes.

Phantomrain.org · Nov 29, 2019

bronze661 said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

shot in 2.7 k rendered into 1080 uploaded to youtube in 12 minutes instead of an hour and 38 minutes.

2k looks so much better and crisper than 1080 so its worth the xtra time to render it. 2K should be quicker also.

bronze661 · Nov 29, 2019

Phantomrain.org said:
2k looks so much better and crisper than 1080 so its worth the xtra time to render it. 2K should be quicker also.

yes I agree. Actually this was 2.7 k. Youtube can only handle so much. And 4k is not worldwide yet. All I know is it still looks good enough for the human eye and brain.

Phantomrain.org · Nov 29, 2019

bronze661 said:
yes I agree. Actually this was 2.7 k. Youtube can only handle so much. And 4k is not worldwide yet. All I know is it still looks good enough for the human eye and brain.

Thats the problem the 1080 does not look good on any of the wider monitors which a lot people do not have so by posting 2k you really create something sharp for everyone to see. I have made quite a few posts about how much of an improvement there is going 2k where is 2k and 4k is not really as noticiable which is why I call it the sweet spot in video.

bronze661 · Nov 30, 2019

Phantomrain.org said:
Thats the problem the 1080 does not look good on any of the wider monitors which a lot people do not have so by posting 2k you really create something sharp for everyone to see. I have made quite a few posts about how much of an improvement there is going 2k where is 2k and 4k is not really as noticiable which is why I call it the sweet spot in video. If you shoot in 1080, it might not be better than 720 which is hd.