One particular senator, talkback radio, licensed operators and airline pilots have been pushing hard for quite some time.Is this correct? I find it hard to believe.
How would registration achieve any of that?I have no problem registering my drone as long as...
a). It means I get to keep flying it.
and,
b). It means operators who do stupid **** are more easily caught. (And punished appropriately)
There have always been laws against flying around an active airport.The main reason new laws against drone operators are written is because of inconsiderate operators. (The gatwick incident is a prime example)
Here's the thing .. do you think anyone wanting to fly with malicious intent is going to register their drone?Well... heres a thing.
Do you think people would fly around airports/during emergencies/anywhere they aren't supposed to be if the authorities could track them down within hours and punish them?
Would you prefer to register your drone for more accountability or an overall ban on drone use?
Whether got it for Christmas or not is probably irrelevant however some if not all of the other considerations you raised will be prescribed in the legislation...Easier said than done. How many people would bother? Does it apply to $50 drones? Would there be an age limit to fly drones? If an 8-year-old got a Tello for Christmas, does he/she need to register first? The range of drones is like from tricycles to sports cars. Where do you draw the line?
Politicians are experts at this.... want to be seen to be doing something but have no idea how to do anything that makes any difference.
Here's the thing .. do you think anyone wanting to fly with malicious intent is going to register their drone?
They have had drone registration in the US for three years now.
I'm not aware that it's actually achieved anything and have not even seen a report of anyone being fined for flying unregistered.
Compulsory drone registration is the kind of thing you bring in when you want to be seen to be doing something but have no idea how to do anything that makes any difference.
CASA have been pretty level-headed about things but Senator Barry O'Sullivan has kept up pressure on them.
He's convinced drones are bad and isn't particularly interested in facts.
https://www.smh.com.au/technology/q...ones-following-committee-20170906-gyc7ek.html
I asked "How many people would bother?". People who want to do the right thing will do what is required of them. They are already following regulations, whether there's compulsory registration or not.Why would you bother? Probably to avoid being sanctions and penalised- to be if any use there has to be a corresponding penalty provision.
I tried talking with his people, made a submission and offered to give a demonstration to clear up some misconceptions.I had t seen that article- the Senator has a serious hard-on for drone hobbyists. What a muppet.
That seems to be the way these things go- yes, absolutely.I asked "How many people would bother?". People who want to do the right thing will do what is required of them. They are already following regulations, whether there's compulsory registration or not.
It's the people who couldn't be bothered or dont care that will be a problem. Compulsory registration won't address the issue. Penalties have not stopped some people from drive-driving or speeding.
I tried talking with his people, made a submission and offered to give a demonstration to clear up some misconceptions.
He had already made up his mind and wasn't interested at all in anything counter to what he was already convinced of.
He didn't understand the change to allow <2kg commercial use without a licence.
He seemed to think that was a bad thing and would lead to all kinds of serious problems.
He couldn't see that it made no change to existing rules for flying <2kg drones.
Can you tell us which Senator so we know who not to vote for?I tried talking with his people, made a submission and offered to give a demonstration to clear up some misconceptions.
He had already made up his mind and wasn't interested at all in anything counter to what he was already convinced of.
He didn't understand the change to allow <2kg commercial use without a licence.
He seemed to think that was a bad thing and would lead to all kinds of serious problems.
He couldn't see that it made no change to existing rules for flying <2kg drones.
The secret is hidden in post #8Can you tell us which Senator so we know who not to vote for?
Don’t let the moustache fool you- it’s a matter of public record that on 14 November 2018 he stated in Parliament, to avoid attacks from other politicians concerning his anti-abortion views, "I'm going to declare my gender today - as I can - to be a woman, and then you'll no longer be able to attack me."Can you tell us which Senator so we know who not to vote for?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.