WithTheBirds
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2018
- Messages
- 2,565
- Reactions
- 1,606
Agree 100% you caution is wise with any flying models. I wouldn’t venture high or far with this particular battery until such time as the performance and telemetry could be further assessed. I might make a decision to retire the pack now if there was more information on its use and history available.For comparison, here is how it comes out when I view it from within my own AirData account - the charge cycle count reads 55.
View attachment 93740
The absence of temperature data is something I enquired about a long time ago and never got an answer. Interestingly, I get temperature data when flying with Litchi and I can see the temp readings by going into the battery menu in flight when flying with GO4. I don't know why temp readings are not included in the flight log data
Yes, I too fly an MA but there is a simple explanation to that; OP's takeoff altitude=215.6m asl, my altitude is 1819.9m asl. I have significantly reduced flight time across all my batteries due to the altitude.
I haven't missed that and agree a period of careful monitoring is important before anything can be concluded (normally). But I would personally not fly with a battery like that even based on what can be seen from this single flight. But that is me, I choose to err on the side of caution.
I don’t know about your experience but out of many lipo’s in many applications I have never had one that improved in performance (particularly cell voltage imbalance) during use other than in cold ambient conditions. If the IR is significantly higher (almost always the case with a failing cell) the V imbalance will increase exponentially.