You'd think it would be obvious in that it's North Americas tallest mountain....
The link will take you to Google Photos where it will show up as a 360 image. New photo · Friday, Jan 23
It’s surprising how easy it is to lose such an enormous mountain as that in such an epic landscape. It was -42C at the time I took a look. Parts of Australia are currently 80C higher than that during one of our summer heatwaves.
You'd think it would be obvious in that it's North Americas tallest mountain....
The link will take you to Google Photos where it will show up as a 360 image. New photo · Friday, Jan 23
Here is the mountain after zooming in from the opening scene. It is to the right of the sun and left of the larger visible mountains. It looks so small because it's a wide angle lens and the mountain is so far away. To the naked eye it looks big . Interestingly, I did a pano with the 2x lens which creates 150image and a resulting file of 856MB. Reducing that file to a smaller reasonable size would not show up online as a 360 in spite of the fact that my program Spherical Viewer would show the smaller file as a 360. I fought with it unsuccessfully.
I used a metadata injector 360 Metadata Image Injector - a Hugging Face Space by nakas to get the 2x tele version uploaded to google photos. Sherical Viewer must do that on it's own. In this version the mountain (Denali) is obscured by clouds but I figured some geeks here might be interested in seeing the 2x tele version.
I can't recall or tell if they were shot from the same place.
The oddest thing is the wide angle version seems to show the mountains larger than the 2x version. I don't get that.
And for another link to a video I may have already posted, a short video of Denali.