This was taken with auto settings. I'm not expecting brilliant quality photos, but I didn't expect a potato cam...
Looks to me like a waterpainting...
I'm on the latest firmware...
This was taken with auto settings. I'm not expecting brilliant quality photos, but I didn't expect a potato cam...
Looks to me like a waterpainting...
I'm on the latest firmware...
Potato? The bepop camera looks like it was shot by a potato. This does not.This was taken with auto settings. I'm not expecting brilliant quality photos, but I didn't expect a potato cam...
Nice photo and good point. He may be taking the photo from the cache rather than the original. However, I think many people have complained about this, so that may be irrelevant as I'm certain they were getting from the disk.I have no issues with the quality. Are you grabbing them from DJI Go's editor and not downloading the original images? I grab mine from the SD card. Here's a sample:
View attachment 5881
It's looks like the website is converting the raw to jpg or you attached 2 jpgs? Honestly, I think the shots are amazing. I'm happy to trade off photo quality with accessibility. I'm filming whales and sharks that would be impossible without a drone and I'm very happy with the portability.The photos were taken from the SD card. I have cache disabled on both my drones.
I have taken some more today and when I look at the picture with 100% magnification, the images look anything but good. The RAW and jpeg files looks like this. I will take more with different settings to see if I can get better results.
View attachment 5887
It's looks like the website is converting the raw to jpg or you attached 2 jpgs? Honestly, I think the shots are amazing. I'm happy to trade off photo quality with accessibility. I'm filming whales and sharks that would be impossible without a drone and I'm very happy with the portability.
Exactly. They need a different quad copter with a much bigger camera.I wish posters would realize this is essentially a $200 camera in the drone. With the number of crashes reported on this website thank goodness DJI didn't put a higher end camera in the drone. It's not supposed to be a professional camera, if enthusiasts need that then they should go spend the extra $2 or $3K for the Inspire.
Yes. I don't believe the comment was directed at you. Lots of newbies complaining about the jpg compression.I appreciate the comments and I am really not comparing the Mavic to my Inspire Pro setup.
I'm only trying to find out if the photos from my Mavic is normal compared to other people's.
I have been comparing the images to my phone to be honest and in my humble opinion, I find the images from my Mavic disappointing.
None the less, I love the fact that I can sling the little drone in my rucksack and to be able to fly off in about 3 mins!
All in all I'm very happy with the Mavic...
There certainly is something a bit weird about the Mavics pictures. It almost looks like a really good CGI version of the real thing. I have no complaints, after all its built to a price point and I seriously doubt they could squeeze a better camera in at this price level.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.