I think so. There is always kind of a threshold in luminance of pixels where NR is applied ... dark regions more than bright regions. If you change exposure to brighten up the critical image regions, they should get detail again - and vice versa. I think that is what we see here.At second half, I am changing exposure compensation values. Pay attention to the trees. Is that the watercolor issue?
Is this a hardware issue though?
As sometimes it's really great.
I got my Mavic 2 days ago and somehow also think mine might be affected by the watercolor effect. I still have a few days to return it and get reimbursed. I already had one before that I returned after 1 day because the gimbal was defective.
Raw photos look quite good actually. But video quite soft in comparison
So here is a link to a video i shot earlier on. It was with custom 0 0 0 and Log
Maybe you could take a look and tell me your opinion if you think it is affected or not.
Here's the video:
Dropbox - DJI_0001.mp4
Thanks everyone,
T
I can see it and NO thats not what you can or supposed to expect from the mavic as it looks like you had the sharping +1 or +2 but you say its +0 I also saw a lot of misquote artifacts . Curious to see if you switched to pal how much difference you would see as this is what u should be getting as it gives the mavic a cold reset when going from NTSC to PAL and back. That footage should have been a lot more cleaner and crisp if you ask me…. thats my .02 also I could really tell at the 1:42 mark the homes in the back area had no detail and the land was too solid lots of water coloring….I got my Mavic 2 days ago and somehow also think mine might be affected by the watercolor effect. I still have a few days to return it and get reimbursed. I already had one before that I returned after 1 day because the gimbal was defective.
Raw photos look quite good actually. But video quite soft in comparison
So here is a link to a video i shot earlier on. It was with custom 0 0 0 and Log
Maybe you could take a look and tell me your opinion if you think it is affected or not.
Here's the video:
Dropbox - DJI_0001.mp4
Thanks everyone,
T
I also like yours and I think your Mavic is OK. Just fine tune your exposure settings, watch your ISO, use ND filters on bright days, and I think you will be good to go. Autofocus was playing with you a bit too, but it was sharp once it settled.I got my Mavic 2 days ago and somehow also think mine might be affected by the watercolor effect. I still have a few days to return it and get reimbursed. I already had one before that I returned after 1 day because the gimbal was defective.
Raw photos look quite good actually. But video quite soft in comparison
So here is a link to a video i shot earlier on. It was with custom 0 0 0 and Log
Maybe you could take a look and tell me your opinion if you think it is affected or not.
Here's the video:
Dropbox - DJI_0001.mp4
Thanks everyone,
T
If you saw the comparison after switching ( HARD reset as per DJI) I bet you would change your tune ! It’s a simple flaw that DJI can fix It’s TOO MUCH NR being added to the video profile!!!!!!!! This has nothing to do with the price of the camera as the footage thats shown above and all of my footage and HUNDREDS of others should look a lot better. You can be satisfied with just ok or give a rats b-hind but some of us strive for perfection as I personally can say this kind of GARBAGE that is coming out of these cameras is not what DJI has for examples online or shows us to persuade us to buy their stuff ! COME on GUYS if no one spoke up just think what it would be like. Noting wrong with perfection and voicing an educated thought or advice…..When I look through this video segment, without magnification, I don't notice the gross watercolor effect most are posting on this thread. When I grab various video stills from the scene above, I get some that look pretty good considering the long distance and opaque nature of the areas indicated by the arrows. When the camera is refocusing, it gets muddy in those areas when looked at closely, like the above example. The flat pasture, hazy horizon, and distant landscape shouldn't be the focus, or the measure of this video in my opinion. The refocusing likely contributed as well as the ops video settings. It's obvious there are many flaws in the Mavic camera system, and @photoboy probably has a more professional eye for this than most, considering his signature. Could it be better? Yes. Do you have to look for it? YES. It doesn't jump out at you or dominate the video by any means at all. And it doesn't look MAJOR to me. If you look for something wrong, I believe you will always find it.
My humble opinion can be summarized as follows: If you don't have a defective unit, the Mavic is a high tech marvel that flies unbelievably great, is extremely well made, takes really good video, and is only $999. Think about that. If you have the obvious camera defect that some appear to have, return in and get a replacement unit as others have done. If it's just plain unacceptable regardless, perhaps consider a professional camera drone. $999 !!!!!!!
Op, what do you think of your video?
I stumbled on the "fix" a week or so ago and posted it here. Several other users reported it working initially for them.
I flew 5 batteries yesterday in harsh winter sunlight around trees with massive amounts of dark twig detail to record - and I have no reoccurrence of the "Watercolour Painting" issue at all. The video and stills including RAW are all great - proving that when, working properly, the Mavis's camera and encoding can produce excellent results.
It is a true testament to the DJI engineers that they can produce such professional results in an amazingly portable and affordable package that even a drone "newbie" like me can operate successfully.
BUT - as we might expect from a first generation of a new technology (folding drones) it is suffering from some teething issues. (Customer service aside). Some are minor (incorrect speed shown), some are annoying (software crashes & disconnects) - but some are very serious.
When my Mavic developed the Watercolour issue it wasn't annoying, it was unusable as a photographic platform. I don't mean disappointing quality, mine was unusable. Video & stills were so horribly digitally mutilated even when downsized to 720.
After my PAL/NTSC reset - it appears the over-processing problem goes away at least for a while. Therefore it is not a hardware, setup or user error - it is a software problem.
Now that is good news for both us as punters and DJI as well as it is fixable without a recall. A software update costs DJI very little to distribute- but if the GPU needed replacing.....
Now some people may only have a minor issue- others major. But I'm afraid there is a serous issue for some. DJI "should" issue a statement acknowledging the issue, say they are working on a future software update to correct it , and maybe offer the NTSC/PAL temporary solution.
Then all us early adopters will just have to wait.
Sent from my iPad using MavicPilots
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.