rydfree
Well-Known Member
I don't think the problem is understanding the words so much as interpreting them and figuring out if and how they're going to be applied to oneself in a given situation. Reasonable people (here, for example) disagree about whether these "guidelines" published by a regulatory agency can be enforced as regulations.
The FAA used the term "Must" as in you Must follow the guidelines ,visual line of sight etc . You could try to interpret to your benefit or argue that they can't be enforced as regulations but "a reasonable person" will see that the FAA was trying to allow the RC community to continue to police itself and follow reasonable rules . They went to great length describing Line Of Sight yet people continue to blatantly disregard that as they ignore most other guidelines .
Canadians did not follow the guidelines and then there was law .
Last edited: