DJI Mavic, Air and Mini Drones
Friendly, Helpful & Knowledgeable Community
Join Us Now

Getting hit on the head by a falling Mavic? Guess which is the best and worst way.

Former Member

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2016
Messages
13,086
Reactions
12,200
Location
Duluth, Georgia
Can anyone guess what would be the best and worst way to get a head strike by a Mavic? Also, any guesses as to your chances of surviving any of the below?

A) 50 mph frontal head strike
B) 50 mph rear head strike
C) 50 mph straight down on the top of your head
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Drone_guy
Can anyone guess what would be the best and worst way to get a head strike by a Mavic? Also, any guesses as to your chances of surviving any of the below?

A) 50 mph frontal head strike
B) 50 mph rear head strike
C) 50 mph straight down on the top of your head


You should have made a poll!

As far as my guess? I think a side strike might be the worst and a top strike best.

Chance of death from a strike? No clue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Former Member
None of them are going to end well, for either object involved, but I imagine A would be worst, given that's where your face is...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Former Member
55mph airspeed or ground speed? I could fly my RC plane backwards sometimes when we were out on the windy parts of the coast, that was fun!

But ok, if it punctured a carotid or jugular with an arm in your neck, or hit the back of your head doing that, it could be bad.

There was a sad accident a while back of a kid getting killed by a RC helicopter- the blades hit his head when he tried to catch it. I think the blades were metal though, luckily ours are a lot safer.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Former Member
I guess from the top is worse, I say NO chance of death or disability would result. A concussion at best. If it were to happen. About as likely as a bus strike
 
  • Like
Reactions: Former Member
I just don't understand why anyone would ask such a silly question !

Even though my question might have sounded silly to you, I was not the one who originally asked it. The question was asked by the FAA to a variety of universities in the USA in trying to assess risk caused by drones to humans. They were tasked with performing lethality studies on human subjects. We have all seen the videos posted here about what a Phantom can do to to the wing of a Mooney private aircraft traveling at 238 mph, and it took a big chunk out of the wing.

I started this thread as a response to a concerned, and justified, post by @noosaguy who wrote the following in the following thread:

Mavic Pro 2 Dropped out of sky!

"Reading this stuff gives me panic attacks. There are times when it's almost unavoidable to fly over people or roads etc. Should our drone 'fall out of the sky' at a time like that (unlucky I know but it potentially could happen) and hit a person and severely injure them, or worse kill them, we would be in major do do. Or should it fall out of the sky and hit a car causing a serious accident... same result. So, my question is, what are the chances of a catastrophic failure whilst flying? Does it happen very often or am I concerned about an improbable and exceptional circumstance?"

The correct answer, according to one university physicist, is that a blow directly to the top of the head by a Mavic would cause the least amount of damage to the person. The larger surface area of the heat sink plate would spread the impact load to a wider surface area. The worst way to get hit would be straight in the forehead, because the front edge of the Mavic would incise and penetrate the skull.

As far as my guess? I think a top strike best.

Correct sir!

I say NO chance of death or disability would result

You are also correct. I was shocked to learn of the low fatality rate of getting a drone slammed in to your head at 50 mph. Most strikes would cause a broken skull, a concussion, and maybe unconsciousness, but a very low number caused death.
 
Last edited:
Even though my question might have sounded silly to you, I was not the one who originally asked it. The question was asked by the FAA to a variety of universities in the USA in trying to assess risk caused by drones to humans. They were tasked with performing lethality studies on human subjects. We have all seen the videos posted here about what a Phantom can do to to the wing of a Mooney private aircraft traveling at 238 mph, and it took a big chunk out of the wing.

I started this thread as a response to a concerned, and justified, post by @noosaguy who wrote the following in the following thread:

Mavic Pro 2 Dropped out of sky!

"Reading this stuff gives me panic attacks. There are times when it's almost unavoidable to fly over people or roads etc. Should our drone 'fall out of the sky' at a time like that (unlucky I know but it potentially could happen) and hit a person and severely injure them, or worse kill them, we would be in major do do. Or should it fall out of the sky and hit a car causing a serious accident... same result. So, my question is, what are the chances of a catastrophic failure whilst flying? Does it happen very often or am I concerned about an improbable and exceptional circumstance?"

The correct answer, according to one university physicist, is that a blow directly to the top of the head by a Mavic would cause the least amount of damage to the person. The larger surface area of the heat sink plate would spread the impact load to a wider surface area. The worst way to get hit would be straight in the forehead, because the front edge of the Mavic would incise and penetrate the skull.



Correct sir!



You are also correct. I was shocked to learn of the low fatality rate of getting a drone slammed in to your head at 50 mph. Most strikes would cause a broken skull, a concussion, and maybe unconsciousness, but a very low number caused death.

I wonder what the terminal velocity of various drone models might be? Probably not as high as that of ejected batteries... The domed shape of the top of the human skull likely evolved as a survival advantage from overhead impacts.
 
”I wonder what the terminal velocity of various drone models might be? Probably not as high as that of ejected batteries...”

Signor Galilei would be frustrated by this statement.

(Edit: if it was about a drone model with a battery vs the same one without.)
 
Last edited:
You're joking, right?
What "overhead impacts" are you suggestion during the evolution of the human skull, Pterodactyls, perhaps?

Bud


The domed shape of the top of the human skull likely evolved as a survival advantage from overhead impacts.
 
You're joking, right?
What "overhead impacts" are you suggestion during the evolution of the human skull, Pterodactyls, perhaps?

Bud

Along with most of our protruding brow ridges, they protect you from being hit by sticks over the head and across our faces.
 
Can anyone guess what would be the best and worst way to get a head strike by a Mavic? Also, any guesses as to your chances of surviving any of the below?

A) 50 mph frontal head strike
B) 50 mph rear head strike
C) 50 mph straight down on the top of your head

I've been hit all three ways (and then some). I'm prefectuly fine. I've also been hit all three ways. I'd only be concerned about a 50 mph frontal head strike, a 50 mph rear head strike or 50 mph straight down on the top of your head. A 50 mph frontal head strike, a 50 mph rear head strike or a 50 mph straight down on the top of your head won't do a thing. I've been hit all three ways (and then some). I also have a bike. It's blue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ac0j
Lycus Tech Mavic Air 3 Case

DJI Drone Deals

New Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
131,138
Messages
1,560,269
Members
160,108
Latest member
CorvusWorks