Yes Indeed. I'm questioning the first post on this thread with the 3 photos. That is the one that appears to mount onto the controller with the elements horizontal.Wouldn't this set-up be correct?View attachment 96684
Yes Indeed. I'm questioning the first post on this thread with the 3 photos. That is the one that appears to mount onto the controller with the elements horizontal.Wouldn't this set-up be correct?View attachment 96684
As you have some experience in radio communications, are you maybe aware of any exceptions that might concern calculating yagi antennas for 5.8 GHz? All the calculators indicate directors’ length to be 23 mm, while the thinigverse project/ebay offer use 14.5 mm directors.Yes Indeed. I'm questioning the first post on this thread with the 3 photos. That is the one that appears to mount onto the controller with the elements horizontal.
I tried using an online calculator, but the antenna did not work well.As you have some experience in radio communications, are you maybe aware of any exceptions that might concern calculating yagi antennas for 5.8 GHz? All the calculators indicate directors’ length to be 23 mm, while the thinigverse project/ebay offer use 14.5 mm directors.
I tried using an online calculator, but the antenna did not work well.
Therefore, I used the sizes from the project found on the Internet. I checked these sizes in the MMANA program, and got good results. It also worked well in flight.
View attachment 96705View attachment 96706
That is my project on thingiverse
With high gain, there will be a very narrow radiation pattern. You need to aim very accurately. I did not do high gain.Have you considered lengthening the antenna for more gain? Would simply adding more directors work, or there is some more complicated stuff going on?
I specify that is rural area not urban areaIs the same Yagi ? printed 3D ?
I can't belive may Mini cant fly more then 1300mt in full FCC (MT1SS5) in EU with hack
In your first image stated a medium range of 2050mt with stock antennaIm in a urban area, ok, but there is a lot of difference
I specify that is rural area not urban area
I use the old russian project , that you found on internet , i just modify the 3d model to reduce plastic in front the antenna and to use 2.5 mm dia for the 2.4 ghz version is a suggestion from Russian designer and my metal is aluminum (iron is not the best one) . But probaly again my test area is : rural area and 100 mt high. Another small notice from my chart . You can see that dispersion of the result is much higher on yaji , due to the difficult to be well oriented (even if it is for me much better then parabolic add-on solution) And again in city area probably the difference is lower. Remember that are passive solution so in very high wifi area ...better to add active antenna (booster)Do you think this is the real effective difference ?
Where I can find your antenna project ?
Your result is in line with my test , speeking about gain in % on flight without yagi vs YagiJust another quick test
On the left witout Yagi, ont the right with yagi, gained arount 600mt, not so bad
Same path from/to home point
View attachment 99882View attachment 99883
Which reminds me of something I only recently learned: If you open the Google Translate app on you phone and click the camera icon, you can point it at text and it will automatically identify the language and translate it. (Say what you will about Google -- and I do -- but they have some awesome technology.)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.