The FAA cannot use law enforcement to help out and law enforcement should not break the law to help out the FAA.Well the FAA does not have any reasonable ability to enforce drone regulations and uses law enforcement to help out. If you don't give ID, how can they possibly report you. Part 107 says you must present upon request an ID.
I think they only arrested him to ID him and inconvenience him. I also think they 100% reported him to the FAA.
The RPIC was incorrect on a lot of things and law enforcement was also.
Law enforcement should of explained and asked for:
A TFR is in effect and started @ ____, it is now _____ and you are in violation.
You are also in controlled air space, can you please provide your LAANC approval.
We will need a valid form of ID, your Part 107 certificate (Or TRUST) and your sUAS registration.
We need this information so that we may report you to the FAA (FSDO, LEAP, ROC)
LAANC distincly states the RPIC must know and abide by TFRs and Restricted and Prohibited air space. The video it seems on purpuse cuts out just below what is shown where it states this.
What app has the FAA sending you a message that a TFR started? I am assuming that he set up his LAANC approval times of operation to end when the TFR began. If this is so, he mistimed it.
The police did a horrible job with making sure he did not develop heat stroke. They are responsible for his well being.
If the police plan to report you to the FAA, I think they need to do it legally and if they let you know, the drone pilot is more likely to cooperate. Asking for a state ID and a date of birth feels like something other than reporting you to the FAA.
I would have to go back and look but I don't think they arrested him for failure to ID but for obstruction but yes, I agree they made the arrest so they could get this ID.
Agreed the RPIC was incorrect on a lot of things. As a recreational pilot, if I am stopped by police, it doesn't matter if I am detained or not, I would probably show my TRUST and show a registration card. Anything beyond that, I get suspicious if it's demanded and not requested especially if only drone violations are at issue. If the police believe you were flying recklessly or you were trespassing then....different story.
LEO doesn't seem to be trained in this particular case which is part of the problem. If you get consent, get as much info as you can. In any case, get as much info as you can except you gotta do it legally.
I think the video gave us enough detail to determine his flight during the TFR, not sure anyone questions that he needed to land and the incident was acknowledged by both sides and then after getting his LAANC.....you're free to go have a nice day.
Last edited: