Standing up for your rights isn't always easy to do. You have a high pressure situation and you are being confronted by armed men with gun who have the right to use force against you pretty much for any reason. Even if you plan to remain silent, you just never know where the situation might turn and it could be pretty stressful for some people. Having your rights and exercising your rights should not be based on whether you can control your tongue or your attitude while you are being violated but it only should matter when it's legal. It's exactly why we have concepts like fruit of the poisonous tree and in this case, his statement about upgrading his drone is totally irrelevant from a legal standpoint; the prosecutor doesn't care about any of that, and he dropped the charges basically saying it doesn't matter what he said.
Citizens have rights, they aren't victims where they can be ambushed, seized, and coerced to buckle under pressure so law enforcement can take advantage of their lack of control or knowledge of the law or see what they can get them to do. No longer, that's changing and anything short of that poor guy getting killed because he said the wrong thing or made the wrong, who are we to judge? Some will claim he should have given up his details to avoid being hot boxed. Not something I would do or say but I don't look back in the mirror and critique how someone else handled being abused because that's what happened here; the law enforcement violated his rights. None of us really know how we'll perform in any given situation. It's a police tactic to tell someone (or imply) they are free to go to get them to drop their guard and then turn about and detain them to see if you get a different outcome. "If you just tell us who you are, you can be on your way. I need your name for my report." We have learned that actually means "give us your positive details and if later in a year or two we decide to press charges, you'll get a summons in the mail or we'll get an arrest warrant and visit you at your workplace."
Citizens have rights, they aren't victims where they can be ambushed, seized, and coerced to buckle under pressure so law enforcement can take advantage of their lack of control or knowledge of the law or see what they can get them to do. No longer, that's changing and anything short of that poor guy getting killed because he said the wrong thing or made the wrong, who are we to judge? Some will claim he should have given up his details to avoid being hot boxed. Not something I would do or say but I don't look back in the mirror and critique how someone else handled being abused because that's what happened here; the law enforcement violated his rights. None of us really know how we'll perform in any given situation. It's a police tactic to tell someone (or imply) they are free to go to get them to drop their guard and then turn about and detain them to see if you get a different outcome. "If you just tell us who you are, you can be on your way. I need your name for my report." We have learned that actually means "give us your positive details and if later in a year or two we decide to press charges, you'll get a summons in the mail or we'll get an arrest warrant and visit you at your workplace."