Brilliant!!Next time use a drone vest to identify you. Police will get intimidated when they see it. It works very well and people respect when you are flying
Brilliant!!Next time use a drone vest to identify you. Police will get intimidated when they see it. It works very well and people respect when you are flying
I have the vest and it says: faa registered drone pilot - please do not disturb.Those who are NOT FAA Part 107 licensed commercial drone pilots, should probably leave off the "COMMERCIAL" part on the vest. You wouldn't want them to bust you for impersonating a "FAA Licensed Commercial Drone Pilot"!
I have the vest and it says: faa registered drone pilot - please do not disturb.
Just purchased this for $24 non prime member.I purchase my vest from Amazon.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B077Z15YJD/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o05_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Brilliant!!
Nice follow upEspecially questions that might trigger them and their insecurities.
Is that a crime???You wouldn't want them to bust you for impersonating a "FAA Licensed Commercial Drone Pilot"!
I would think not, as long as you are not actually doing commercial work, wearing a west and not having the required license.Is that a crime???
Then the daisy should quit.
Hey brother I feel for you.I think its all bs myself what they did.For us uav its like driving while blk. Lol.im in South Bend next door at nd.ill come fly with you anytime. I just don't get law enforcement not willing to understand our position on flying to do no harm.but for good and a new perspective, we spent all this money on equipment to enjoy our hobby follow the rules and still get grief for it,drones are here to stay and they faa need to resolve this air space bs so we can fly without the fear of getting arrested and our equipment seized and not returned thats just not right .we should all go there fly in protest this treatment..in.Those MF'ers! Totally uncalled for! The police acted as if you provoked them which in and of itself is not against the law. What is against the law is if they are actively investigating a crime and you impede them in some way. You did not as there was no crime committed and you asked a standard question (snarky or not) they are public servants. Who was served in this instance?
The fact that the prosecutor did not pursue the charges clearly means that you personally broke no laws! Go before a judge and say your sorry? Sorry for what ? Enjoying yourself without doing harm.
These encounters can get out of hand if you had been a hot-heat and resisted them in any way. They were just waiting for that so they could pin "resisting arrest" on you.
This is such an over reach of authority! I would ask for a formal apology from the officers involved and push for proper training of thier rent-a-cops uh ,ehem , cough I mean police personnel with regards to currently enacted UAV laws and regulations.
I would be flying in that park regularly after this incident. This type of handling can really leave someone with a bit of drone flying PTSD.
I have one also. It's not law enforcement, but more for people who want to approach and start conversing.Vest or not, the police aren't going to care if they're trying to enforce a local ordinance, even if the ordinance is in violation of state law. In fact they'll probably just laugh at you. Just like you can't get out of a speeding ticket by wearing a racing helmet.
I can finally talk about this now that the legal matter is settled.
A few weeks ago, I was flying my mavic. An officer approached and told me drones are not allowed in the park. I was polite and told him that I’m pretty smart when it comes to drone law and I did not know it was illegal to fly here. I asked if he could show me where this rule was written. I’ll call him “good cop”
I already knew that a: there is no such rule, and b: even if there was, Michigan has a strong preemption law that prevents local units of government from enacting or enforcing any rule regarding the possession or operation of unmanned aircraft.
This officer called for backup. A second officer arrived. I’ll call him “bad cop.” He was pretty hostile and came towards me with a little
Booklet and said basically “it says right here, ascending or descending....” pointing at rule 23, which prohibits manned aircraft, manned hot air balloons, or manned parachutes from ascending or descending in the park.
I said “can I ask you a question?”
He said yes
“Am I in an airplane?”
That was it. He had me turn around and put my hands behind my back.
He searched me, and laughed when I told him I do not consent.
Then stuffed me in the back of a police car. They pulled me out after a few minutes and searched me again. I was able to hand them a copy of the state preemption law, which I was able to reach because it was in my back pocket. Then they stuffed me back in the patrol car.
My mavic and iPad were confiscated, and just to let me know who’s in charge, he took my personal cell phone too.
After about 30-40 minutes I was released with a misdemeanor citation for “unauthorized flying of drone in park” citing rule 23.
They kept all of my stuff. I was able to get my cell phone returned after a couple of days. I still haven’t gotten my mavic or iPad back.
All of the audio was recorded on my Apple Watch. I will post it here shortly.
I’m a 40 year old professional. I’ve never been in handcuffs before this.
View attachment 57583
View attachment 57584
Great idea to password protect all devices and have ability to remotely back up and erase data in case of theft. Have to be careful though about wiping the device while its in police custody because that can lead to destruction of evidence charge which can be felony. The data on the phone belongs to you BUT if police seize it as possible evidence, consult with attorney before wiping remotely.
Lapeer, do you know if police searched or copied your SD card or phone?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.