Hello,Moved your thread
You originally posted your thread in the wrong section. Therefore, I moved itHello,
I don't understand. What's mean "moved your thread"? Do I have ability to ask the question? Or there are special rules?
Thank you
Thank you for clarification. Ok, to avoid potential mistake would you please to help me? I have a question related to the UAS's collected data storage. What forum's topic is correct for this question?You originally posted your thread in the wrong section. Therefore, I moved it
Well, but what to do if there are three projects with 12000-14000 pictures for each one?I store my photos and videos on one of my desktop hard drives, and back them up to the cloud. Diskspace is cheap and I don't compress anything.
I'm trying to understand your question. The number of files has little to no bearing. My picture hard drive contains 37,000 picture files. On a 4TB drive, that means my files take up about 1/12 (or .083 if decimals are your thing) of the space on the drive.Well, but what to do if there are three projects with 12000-14000 pictures for each one?
Thank you for details. I appreciate that.
I explained you what my question is.
Let's calculate: 14000x3=42000 pictures.
The average size of each picture is 40000 KB (or 40 MB), therefore the total will be
40 x 42000=1680000 MB or 1.68 TB.
The processing can be made on laptop with 1 TB or desktop with 2 TB.
The remote location as cloud or outside disk is not working due to low speed between CPU and outside storage.
I'm looking for solution to use existing hardware (buying more and more servers is not a decision).
RSLC compress the files at least 3 times that means 1.68/3 = 0.56 TB which allows me both process (Pix4D) and storage geotagged images in one place.
That's my question.
Thank you
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.