This post is dripping with irony. You complain about your lack on engagement in the rules making process by an over reaching government when it relates to a "free people" yet defend wreckless drone operations that have and will increase a further encroachment into our freedoms by the same government. Rules are usually written because of careless people conducting careless activities..not because some bureaucrat is bored.
Have I flown in a no-fly zone...yup...after contacting the local tower and tell them who I was, what I was doing, where I was doing, and at what altitude I would remain at. The tower dude was like "ok" and that was the end of it. I flew, kept an eye out for overflying traffic and got my footage. Completely legal.
The chance of a drone going rogue is remote (no pun intended) but everyone knows that it has occurred. Do you want to explain law enforcement, including the FAA, why they found your drone in the middle of a taxiway? Or maybe to the lawyers of the families of victims you killed when your drone slammed into a landing airplane...or was ingested by an engine? I wouldn't.
As for the probability of such an event; low but professional pilots training constantly for things that will probably NEVER happen. I have hundreds of hours in the simulator training for events that in my 6500 hours of flying have not happened....yet.
It is simply not worth it for anyone involved. It can hurt the hobby...or for some, a profession. It will lead to further regulation which is the absolute last thing anyone wants. There are ways to operate safely.
While I am concerned that someone was operating a drone near a major airport (and busy road), the greatest concern is the attitude towards the operation when called out on it.
Finally, technology is being developed that will allow airports and local law enforcement to track individual drones.
Hundreds violate FAA's no drone fly zone at Balloon Fiesta
Ok let be honest. I know 85% of pilots once they have some kind of confidence have "drifted" over into a "no fly zone" but let break that down. First off raise your hand if you don't mind destroying your mavic. Ok no one so the plan is not to touch anything. Second who wants to hurt someone and destroy this bird. Again no one. Does it happen, Absolutely count on it but if your telling me that exact same scenario does not or has not played out in "fly zones" your wrong. I could get hit by a car just as easy in front of my house as I could downtown. So what some people are "up in arms" for is a set of words written by a politician on a fancy piece of paper, he who surley does not fly drones, and like magic just because he wrote it down on paper and then took it to his buddies and said hey look what I did and they all said sure that works, that's what your upset and defending? That's really laughable to be honest because I don't remember being in that paper vote and does anyone here actually personally know any of the people involved in making magic areas on a map unavailable to the free people of planet Earth? That truly is amazing to me that anyone would actually care where Susy q or Jon Doe fly thier , THIER mavic. If this was a video with someone buzzing people or getting close to aircraft for games or just for pictures then yes hey quit being an idiot but in a world where this person literally did no harm to anyone, you sir would have if you could, approached and arrested the pilot and had he said what I just did you would have then beaten and kidnapped them and thrown them in a cage..so let's just all chill out, be free willed human beings were born to be and fly with common sense . He has no greater chance of hitting anyone or anything on the strip at that altitude than he would anywhere else. Could be in the Gobi desert and have a malfunction and watch as it literally tumbled out of the sky and smack into the only other soul for hundreds of miles. Everything is probability.