WOW - awesome analysis job! Yes, you are absolutely correct about WP5 area. I was attempting to minimize the camera down pitch for the view thus flying somewhat low around that rock bump. I just got back from doing a bit more "looking around" and noticed that it is much more prominent on the south-east edge than the google image would suggest. It turns out with the rounded flight path it ended up with a 10' deficit right as it met the bump. So, while I could not see and/or retrieve the drone, it has got to be down below (about 400' - 600') most likely shattered into a million pieces.
Another question: How are you doing the virtual flight? All I used for this is the 3D KML with GoogleEarth Pro - and where did that lead me
Yes, I was also going to say that there was not enough room just after WP 5 (only some meters away and/or over the cliff).
A great care is to be taken with the elevations displayed in Google Earth, particularly in mountainous areas. Elevations are most of time a mean of a minimum 10X10 m square area (i.e. 100 square meters). This means that along steep slopes Google estimations can be completely wrong (by 20 or 30m at a precise point, sometimes). In addition Litchi often uses old google maps which are far less accurate than recent Google Earth maps. And last but not least, both old and recent maps do not take into account the vegetation. When flying at only 3 or 4m above ground, even a bush can be fatal, specially when paning such as you did after WP 5 (obstacle avoidance does not work).
Virtual flight can be performed in Google Earth by using Virtual Litchi Mission from Namirda. Have a look here : Virtual Litchi Mission
Sorry for your loss, anyway...
P.S. VLM also displays what Namirda called "Diagnostics" This show that at WP 5 your altitude relative to ground is only 18m, decreasing rapidly jut after this waypoint to what I estimate around 5m. With respect to the imprecision of Google Earth elevations along this kind of slope and to the margin of error of the drone in both its altitude and position instantaneous mesurements, this is not secure at all.
Last edited: