Nisse Järnet
Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2018
- Messages
- 6
- Reactions
- 1
- Age
- 40
60 fps appeals to those that assume more must be better but there's really little reason to use 60 fps unless you are wanting to slow the motion.Dont forget that 4K@60fps in P4P have serious issues (Pixel binning / line skipping) in image quality...
Your problem isn’t the computer, it’s QuickTime..What's the 4K H265 recording/playback like on the P4P? Im truly struggling to use H265 with my M2P. I'm using a 2017 iMac 5K top spec with 32GB RAM and just can't avoid terrible judder on playback using Quicktime as the player. Tried converting to various flavours of Prores and from H265 to H264 using the iFFMpeg converter all with no joy. Am I correct in thinking that in order to use the 10-bit D-Log feature H265 is the only option? Also tried using iMovie for playback, again no joy. Any help would be much appreciated!!
Your problem isn’t the computer, it’s QuickTime..
I owned both for a short period and chose to get rid of the P4P. The color is the main reason I got rid of the P4P. The M2P is closer to actual natural color. The P4P tends to “cool” every shot. Especially during golden hour. Not to mention it’s a pain to lug around the phantom if you’re a photographer too. Camera, lenses, strobes, softboxes, etc. The gear adds up and the Mavic 2 Pro reduces the load.
Since image quality between the two isn’t far off, sometimes the P4P had the better shot and sometimes the M2P did. The only reason to get/keep a P4P depends on the need for 4K@60. Drone shots are pretty slow as it is and I find myself speeding up footage in post rather than slowing it down. Not getting into the fact that most people tend to overuse drone shots in their productions nowadays, in my opinion.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.