What's interesting to me here is this...
If a car or plane was released and at very early stages a few issues were found to be present that somehow escaped any form of quality assurance and safety testing.
Wouldn't the FAA be able to suspend the use of any vehicles under their jurisdiction?
I am not saying this needs to happen whatsoever but I am saying is from what I have read so far, there seems to be circumstances where the ARTH could collide with objects, this seems to have happened possibly once or twice already. Couldn't one of those objects possibly be a person, and if a person was accidently hit by an autonomous ARTH system then who is liable. The pilot, the manufacturer or the governing body, the FAA?
Thankfully 99% of drone pilots are not idiots, contrary to popular belief and they can cancel and guide ARTH from there. I don't know, just thinking out aloud here...