Just found a PDF version of it here UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS ACT (EXCERPT) Act 436 of 2016 259.305.new
Some more relative postings UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS ACT Act 436 of 2016
This is where I believe Lapeer20m got the link from Newbie question: Local ordinance in Michigan which is a MavicPilots thread
Update:
Was able to read all of the UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS ACT Act 436 of 2016. In Section 259.303 are the definitions.
In Section 259.305 it explains Political subdivision; limitations; powers; federal preemption; conflict with other sections of law.
I ask because I found this confusing. #1 says no enacting or enforcing an ordinance or resolution that regulates the ownership or operation. #2 says doesn't stop a political subdivision from promulgating rules, regulations, and ordinances for the use of. So does that mean the county cannot ask him to leave because of #1 but can put a law into effect because of #2.
Some more relative postings UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS ACT Act 436 of 2016
This is where I believe Lapeer20m got the link from Newbie question: Local ordinance in Michigan which is a MavicPilots thread
Update:
Was able to read all of the UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS ACT Act 436 of 2016. In Section 259.303 are the definitions.
(b) "Political subdivision" means a county, city, village, township, or other political subdivision, public corporation, authority, or district in this state.
In Section 259.305 it explains Political subdivision; limitations; powers; federal preemption; conflict with other sections of law.
(1) Except as expressly authorized by statute, a political subdivision shall not enact or enforce an ordinance or resolution that regulates the ownership or operation of unmanned aircraft or otherwise engage in the regulation of the ownership or operation of unmanned aircraft.
(2) This act does not prohibit a political subdivision from promulgating rules, regulations, and ordinances for the use of unmanned aircraft systems by the political subdivision within the boundaries of the political subdivision.
That was my reason for looking it up, to see what this act actually does. He was in a county park, so does their rule still stand? He can't fly there?(2) This act does not prohibit a political subdivision from promulgating rules, regulations, and ordinances for the use of unmanned aircraft systems by the political subdivision within the boundaries of the political subdivision.
I ask because I found this confusing. #1 says no enacting or enforcing an ordinance or resolution that regulates the ownership or operation. #2 says doesn't stop a political subdivision from promulgating rules, regulations, and ordinances for the use of. So does that mean the county cannot ask him to leave because of #1 but can put a law into effect because of #2.
Last edited: