I have both the
Mavic 2 Pro and the
Mini 2, and formerly the
Mini 1. The
Mini 2 is really a good little drone but it's not a
Mavic 2. Wind "resistance" and stability are not the same things. And while the
Mini 2 has very good wind resistance it does not have the stability of the
Mavic 2. A lot depends on how you're flying into the wind, with the wind or with a crosswind. Flying and filming are inter-related, but while the
Mini 2 flys fine in a lot of conditions, there are some filming constraints beyond the fixed aperture and smaller sensor.
One of the things that allows the
Mini 2 to fly in stronger winds is increased maximum pitch. I think on occasion the pitch exceeds the gimbals full range of motion. Also, at high speed the gimbal can be blown around, which I have seen only on occasion on my
Mavic 2 Pro.
But here's the thing that leaves me scratching my head about what I consider an arbitrary weight cutoff for classification... As soon as you add something (that I consider necessary) such as leg extensions or even something as basic as a decent strobe it puts you over the weight limit, if only by a handful of grams. Even a 300 gram threshold would provide all the headroom one migh need for necessary accessories. That extra 50 grams is only 1.8 ounces. When you think that the next category up (at least in the US) takes us all the way up to 55 POUNDS (about 30KG) this weight cut-off seems ludicrous. I guess what I'm saying, is that if you're ditching your
Mavic 2 to downsize for regulation, I would suggest that perhaps the regulation is so restrictive that it might make more sense to jump through the regulatory hoops to continue flying your
Mavic 2?