First-time poster, so I apologize in advance if I am rehashing old issues, but I believe quite strongly in this one...
From what I have seen on this and other forums, there is enough evidence that a number of fly-aways and crashes could have been avoided if a selectable ATTI mode was possible. And yes, I know a lot of these issues were caused by user error, pilots not reading the manual, trying risky maneuvers and generally using the Mavic Pro outside its intended parameters. No argument there...
I also know that DJI are in some way trying to do the right thing by preventing us from operating in no-fly zones. The implementation might be poor, and I get that people don't like to be nannied - the reality is that the hobby is getting a bad name due to (often incorrectly reported) operators who create or allow dangerous situations. So I believe the GPS-based monitoring of NFZ's is probably here to stay, and possibly (obviously there are exceptions, and I would like to consider myself and every other responsible Mavic Pro owner as exceptions), just possibly even a good thing.
Primarily from a safety point of view, but also from the point of view of allowing us to have fun - I think on balance a selectable ATTI mode would be an excellent addition.
Firstly, it should be possible to implement the NFZ criteria in parallel - nobody is saying don't allow the GPS to monitor the aircraft position relative to a NFZ. This could be done in two ways - make it impossible to launch in ATTI mode, but allow switching after the GPS position has been checked in relation to NFZ's. That way pilots could still be prevented from taking off in a NFZ. Then, in flight - continue to allow the craft to monitor the GPS position and cancel ATTI mode when approaching a NFZ, going back to GPS mode and preventing the aircraft from entering a NFZ. As a secondary benefit, pressing RTH could probably be set to disengage ATTI mode and revert to GPS mode - after all, RTH (not "Hover in place" or "Land at present location") must surely rely on GPS mode?
Secondly, if DJI really wanted to they could make the provision of a selectable ATTI mode contingent upon the acceptance of a risk waiver in the form of additional terms and conditions (like those lucky folk who take their cars to the Nurburgring on the weekend).
I guess my point is, apart from NFZ restrictions - which seem form what I read to be a bit hit-and-miss anyway - having ATTI mode selectable has very little in the way of a downside. And I think the NFZ issues can be taken care of. Flying in GPS mode is not going to stop me from flying over cars, or crowds of people, or crashing into people on the beach. Common sense and my love of the hobby will prevent me from being in those situations, and ATTI mode just might help me when GPS reception fails.
I love my Mavic Pro, but I am constantly reminded of the number of people who have fly-ways and crashes due to the fact that there is no real manual override.
I think that makes for a less-than-perfect flying experience.
From what I have seen on this and other forums, there is enough evidence that a number of fly-aways and crashes could have been avoided if a selectable ATTI mode was possible. And yes, I know a lot of these issues were caused by user error, pilots not reading the manual, trying risky maneuvers and generally using the Mavic Pro outside its intended parameters. No argument there...
I also know that DJI are in some way trying to do the right thing by preventing us from operating in no-fly zones. The implementation might be poor, and I get that people don't like to be nannied - the reality is that the hobby is getting a bad name due to (often incorrectly reported) operators who create or allow dangerous situations. So I believe the GPS-based monitoring of NFZ's is probably here to stay, and possibly (obviously there are exceptions, and I would like to consider myself and every other responsible Mavic Pro owner as exceptions), just possibly even a good thing.
Primarily from a safety point of view, but also from the point of view of allowing us to have fun - I think on balance a selectable ATTI mode would be an excellent addition.
Firstly, it should be possible to implement the NFZ criteria in parallel - nobody is saying don't allow the GPS to monitor the aircraft position relative to a NFZ. This could be done in two ways - make it impossible to launch in ATTI mode, but allow switching after the GPS position has been checked in relation to NFZ's. That way pilots could still be prevented from taking off in a NFZ. Then, in flight - continue to allow the craft to monitor the GPS position and cancel ATTI mode when approaching a NFZ, going back to GPS mode and preventing the aircraft from entering a NFZ. As a secondary benefit, pressing RTH could probably be set to disengage ATTI mode and revert to GPS mode - after all, RTH (not "Hover in place" or "Land at present location") must surely rely on GPS mode?
Secondly, if DJI really wanted to they could make the provision of a selectable ATTI mode contingent upon the acceptance of a risk waiver in the form of additional terms and conditions (like those lucky folk who take their cars to the Nurburgring on the weekend).
I guess my point is, apart from NFZ restrictions - which seem form what I read to be a bit hit-and-miss anyway - having ATTI mode selectable has very little in the way of a downside. And I think the NFZ issues can be taken care of. Flying in GPS mode is not going to stop me from flying over cars, or crowds of people, or crashing into people on the beach. Common sense and my love of the hobby will prevent me from being in those situations, and ATTI mode just might help me when GPS reception fails.
I love my Mavic Pro, but I am constantly reminded of the number of people who have fly-ways and crashes due to the fact that there is no real manual override.
I think that makes for a less-than-perfect flying experience.
Last edited: