Not my idea of a safe flight but realistically it was NOT a near miss, it was a near HIT.
well well well and all this time i thought that VLOS meant the drone ,not the object that it was flying over at the time silly me
I would like to get some lights on mine as well if they weren’t so expensive
I use 4 Firehouse ARC2s, one on each arm; 2whites on rear arms and then a red and a green on each front leg ... all in Aerial Pixel mounts no Velcro or adhesive needed. These have over 600 flights on them since Dec 2018. As mentioned above, this also helps visual recognition of drone orientation. Never a camera problem
View attachment 80110
Get the ARC2s, visibility is much better. They weigh about 4 grams each. So four of them is insignificant added weight. I use 4 of them and notice no difference in any flight characteristics.Wow! How much extra weight does that add? I have a MPP and I’m wanting to get some strobes and was wondering if I should get the 2 or 4 LED strobes. Which would you recommend?
Get the ARC2s, visibility is much better. They weigh about 4 grams each. So four of them is insignificant added weight. I use 4 of them and notice no difference in any flight characteristics.
Get the ARC2s, visibility is much better. They weigh about 4 grams each. So four of them is insignificant added weight. I use 4 of them and notice no difference in any flight characteristics.
Dunno... try Googling it. I have always bought directly from Firehouse... who also posts in other sales venues.
my glasses are 3XBTW ... Binoculars don't satisfy VLOS requirements. Eye glasses and contacts are the most "aid" that you can use.
According to Section 107.31 -
(a) With vision that is unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, the remote pilot in command, the visual observer (if one is used), and the person manipulating the flight control of the small unmanned aircraft system must be able to see the unmanned aircraft throughout the entire flight in order to:
(1) Know the unmanned aircraft’s location;
(2) Determine the unmanned aircraft’s attitude, altitude, and direction of flight;
(3) Observe the airspace for other air traffic or hazards; and
(4) Determine that the unmanned aircraft does not endanger the life or property of another.
Sounds like a good idea to me.If everyone only flew where they could actually see there drone with the naked eye then they wouldn’t be flying past 1000ft?
That soundtrack is really irritating
You’re exactly right. I’ve been disappointed to find the drone community is the least grown up and mature I’ve ever seen. In most hobbys, self-policing works. But not here it seems. The result will be more and more restrictive regulations.I think there is an entire generation that drinks fluoride at every meal, and has lost the ability to THINK. Amazing! Just because you can afford an expensive toy does NOT mean you should be flying one! Apparently you have NOT read FAA rules, nor ever taken an FAA test for commercial operations, and yet want to shoot pro video. The worst thing is that NO ONE in these forums is willing to be politically Incorrect enough to slap this pilot-wanna-be over the freakin' head and tell him to get educated BEFORE you place a potential hazard to city traffic in the air over a Freeway bridge? Unbelievable! This is no forum, it is more like a brag page!
Those are for the new mini Mavic! HahaView attachment 80283 my glasses are 3X