Not impressed with the MA

[ac0j]

So the air is a little more crash proof........ Great for questionable piloting, but not a real selling point.
I have seen nothing to prove the camera is enough better to be a factor. Other than claimed specs in print. Photo and video IRL not much if any noticeable difference to me.
The air has its place, but the pro offers more bang for the buck I think.

 

[Wacker2611]

Thanx dawg...I wanna be just like you!!

What’s interesting to me is that you appear to have never owned a Mavic Air, though you seem to spend a lot of time on the Air forum slagging it off. I also spend a bit of time on here, but that’s because I own one. When I owned my Pro, I spent a lot of time on there but as I no longer own one, I can’t remember the last time I even looked. It’s nice that you’re showing an interest, and of course you’re entitled to post wherever you like and express your opinion. However I can’t understand your relentless negativity on a piece of equipment that you have little or no experience of. Reminds me of the console wars when I was a teenager, and you appear to be 66 years of age.

 

[Michael W.]

lol, san francisco is the epicenter of the silicon valley - more interference there than any place on earth.

Say what? San Francisco isn't even in the silicon valley, let alone the epicenter.