DJI Mavic, Air and Mini Drones
Friendly, Helpful & Knowledgeable Community
Join Us Now

Ottawa toughens rules for operating recreational drones

Steve1966

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2017
Messages
104
Reactions
32
Age
58
This is a copy paste from globe and mail in Canada

Transport Minister Marc Garneau is cracking down on recreational drones with new safety restrictions to keep them nine kilometres from any airport and ban their owners from flying near people, buildings, at night and when first responders are at the scene of an emergency.

The rigorous rules that come into effect immediately also force recreational owners to clearly mark their drones with contact information. The federal government is promising even stricter regulations for all unmanned aircraft in June.

I am taking measures now, before a drone hits an airplane and causes a catastrophic accident. That’s the kind of nightmare scenario that keeps me up at night,” Mr. Garneau said in prepared remarks, provided to The Globe and Mail.

Mr. Garneau, who will announce the new rules at Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport on Thursday, has become concerned about the number of reported drone incidents, which have more than tripled from 41 when data collection began in 2014 to 148 last year.

“There have been several very worrying incidents in Canada involving near-collisions of drones and aircraft. We need to do everything in our power to stop this from happening,” Mr. Garneau said. “When there is a significant risk to aviation, I have the power to issue an immediate measure until new regulations can be enacted. And that is what I have done.”

Under the new rules, recreational drone operators must stay far away from controlled or restricted airspace, forest fires and first-responder emergency operation sites.

They also cannot fly higher than 90 metres; fly within 75 metres of buildings, vehicles or people; or fly within nine kilometres of any airport, heliport, seaplane base or airstrip where aircraft take off and land.

A senior Transport Canada official, who was involved in drafting the new rules, said there have been troubling incidents where people have flown drones over forest fires in British Columbia, forcing the grounding of water bombers. In other cases, seaplane and helicopter operations in Vancouver’s Coal Harbour have been halted because of drones flying overhead.

“Of our top five airports [across Canada], we are seeing incidents where pilots are reporting seeing these drones 200 or 300 feet away as they approach the airport during one of the more critical points of the flight,” the official said.

The new restrictions apply to anyone operating an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) weighting more than 250 grams and up to 35 kilograms. Any recreational operator who fails to comply with the new flying restrictions would face fines of up to $3,000.

The RCMP and police forces across the country will be working with Transport Canada inspectors to enforce the new measures.

Until now, the rules required recreational-drone owners to be able to see their aircraft at all times when the vehicles are in flight but there were few other restrictions, except that they were not permitted to fly into the clouds or in restricted air space such as airports. Unlike commercial users, recreational-drone flyers also do not need a certificate to operate their UAVs.

Anyone flying drones for commercial, academic or research purposes are not affected by the new measures. The military, law enforcement and businesses have increasingly been using drones but obtain special flight operating certificates. Energy companies, for example, use drones to inspect pipelines while farmers use them to monitor livestock.

“The government certainly doesn’t want to restrict drones so much that we hinder innovation because it’s so important to our economy and standard of living,” Mr. Garneau said. “But, like any new technology, drones must be used with care. And we cannot wait until something bad happens before we act.”

Mr. Garneau said Ottawa plans to propose new regulations that govern all unmanned aircraft in June. Those regulations will lay out rules of flight, knowledge testing, minimum age limits, pilot permits and how drones are to be marked and registered.

The department is considering an age restriction of 14 to operate a small drone and a minimum of 16 to fly a drone heavier than one kilogram. People may also have to pass an exam to fly drones for recreational purposes.
 
Wow, as someone who just ordered a mavic from Ottawa, I'm going to dig up these new "emergency measures" now...

I've read the proposed changes for this summer, and they aren't that crazy, but this sounds like a crazy knee-jerk reaction to me. I'm not so concerned about "following the rules" but it's press coverage like this that will make anyone and everyone be hyper-vigilant against drones now. Now all law enforcement, and public will be "Look, that's a drone, they crash airplanes! The news said it's illegal to fly those now, Get him!" (yes, I'm exaggerating a bit, but regardless, the impact this type of reaction from our government will make won't be a positive one).

Now I'm really looking forward to the new "proper" legislation coming into effect this summer... Ugh...
 
  • Like
Reactions: boxsterfahrer
Ugh, can we get any other Canadian pilots here on these forums to go over the the globe and mail site and post on the comments section with some real info?

I've already countered one post stating that there is no use for recreational drones except spying on people, they are all toys, and shouldn't be allowed (paraphrased).

The main concern is that these rules were already (soft) in-place for recreational flyers. And flying safely, and respectfully, resulted in no real issues. The new rules coming were generally positive, adding a mechanism for legit recreational fliers to be "licensed" and to register their drones (no different than a hunting license, or boating license, etc). I think that makes sense. But jumping the gun like this seems heavy handed, and doesn't serve much except political grand-standing, which just hurts the hobby.

Article at: Ottawa toughens rules for operating recreational drones

Comments directly at:
Ottawa toughens rules for operating recreational drones
 
  • Like
Reactions: delray
is this all of Ottawa, or Canada as a whole?........

When he says "Ottawa toughens rules" he means our government (Ottawa is national capital).

The new rules which supposedly take effect immediately are actually ALL of Canada (nation wide). The details of the rules have not been posted beyond what the globe and mail quoted. Waiting on the supposed official announcement of the details sometime today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UnAvoidable Drone
It's too bad that it has to come to there drastic regulation because of a few drone operators that do not respect the rules that are already in place, Max altitude of 300' don't fly near airports, keep your drone in line of sight etc. All drone operators will suffer because of the few that think that the rules are not for them.
 
These rules do have some basis in reality, however; the over reaction is typical of liberal socialist mentaltality of "big brother" protecting the public like a father figure. "We know what is best for you!"
 
These rules do have some basis in reality, however; the over reaction is typical of liberal socialist mentaltality of "big brother" protecting the public like a father figure. "We know what is best for you!"

I agree, it's the over-reaction that's the problem...

The rules themselves were already in place.

Actually some were relaxed (eg: the restriction on flying around or over buildings/people/vehicles/roads, etc was 150M before, now it's 75M according to that article.)

But the fact they parade it out on national media, make a big show of announcing it at the airport in Toronto, and draw lots of attention to it, coupled with the fact they make it an outright ban on the activity with hard fines attached, instead of more correct regulation, with exception cases where needed etc...

The main worry I have is that before I could practice in a vacant parking lot away from anyone (yes, within 150M of a building, but flying in beginner mode, etc) and before if someone came by and complained, I'd pack up and leave, no harm done. If they were irrational and called the cops, chances are a cop would come and say something to the effect of "Pack it up and go home" (as long as I wasn't belligerent or a jerk to him, and I was clear I was trying to fly safely, etc).

But now with this announcement:

A) random joe-public might be more likely to get in my face about it because "Drones crash planes! and spy on people!"

B) When he does call the cops, the cop is far more likely to write me a nice fat $2000 fine because there is pressure from the government to "make examples" now.

Same thing applies to airports.

Right now there are plenty of spots where I could fly safely in fields, or parks, or parking lots, nowhere near people, and in a safe way. But it's maybe 5km from an airport, or 7km from an airport. In those cases, it's of pretty much zero threat to conventional aviation. At the altitudes I'm flying at, and distance out, it won't be an issue. I'd call ATC at the airport, notify them, and fly safely.

Now same thing applies, new rulings make it hard and fast, and fines apply...

Anyway, first off, looking forward to the new legislation later this summer, hopefully with more realistic outlines, and exemption/exception cases. I do like the idea of licensing, skill testing, and registration of drones. But this government knee-jerk reaction crap troubles me.

Also looking for this new announcement later today, where they formally release these details. Until then, we don't have any real facts on the actual restrictions. Just what the reporter at the globe and mail have chosen to share in the article. Hopefully once it is released it's not as bad as it sounds.
 
d9b19fec267947aead8e79dbfb0002e6.jpg


I hope this gives a pic of my screen shot.

This is setup to 9 km radius from airports. And the marker is where I live so now I can't even fly at home.

I will confess my mavic has always been set to 120 meters which I will change to 90 meters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: o MURDOCK o
They need to get realistic. 5 km from any airport or heli pad and if you can see a plane or helicopter in air then land drone till danger passes. And I would not fly over people anyway. I fly about 150 from roads, I do cross them but now it feels like I have wasted $2000
Plus I like watching my 8 year old daughter fly it in beginner mode. She likes tripod mode. But now if some neibour is mad or a car passes and sees her fly or me fly then can call and I get upto $3000 fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: boxsterfahrer
This is a pic of the news being posted on a Facebook newsgroup. Literally the first two responses summed up the worst of both sides of drone use. The rest of the conversation should be entertaining but the sad part is that some of these folks actually vote and walk the streets.

DroneLawReactionFacebook.jpg
 
Hopefully someone takes that guys gun away before he tries to shoot down a drone and misses and the bullet flies a mile or so and kills someone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ggessel
Further down in the thread he claims to have already shot down two at his camp. It's most likely magic mushroom dreaming he's talking about but who knows. He'd probably be the only civilian to have ever shot down two drones.
 
Those restrictions would make it impossible to ever fly legally in my state. You cannot ever be 9km clear of an airport or helipad. The more restrictive the rules become only increase the number of illegal flights, but will not actually the stop the flights. I honestly think the law should be something more like no fly zone 1km from border of an airport (or maybe 2km from the center point), 500m from a helipad, stay under 400 ft everywhere else, stay 200 ft above private property. And like riding a bike or something else on the streets you can be ticketed for reckless driving, assault, or whatever for doing something stupid. Larger drones require licenses (just like moving up from a bike to a car).
 
This is just sad, in what reality does a plane 9km away from the airport fly below 290ft?

I wrote this before that if I am at 290 feet and 5 miles from the airfield when flying full sized aircraft, I am already calling Mayday and looking for a place to land.

I am a Canadian pilot and full size pilot and think the distance restriction is ridiculous.

At three miles, I need to be no lower than 1000 feet above field elevation.
 
What a bummer for millions of proud new Mavic Pro owners.

I feel like I now need to call air traffic control to get clearance to use the flight simulator in the DJI go app.
 
Here's the legalese of the interim order.

Interim Order Respecting the Use of Model Aircraft - Transport Canada

Not only do helipads qualify for the 9km rule, any area prepared for or used to land aircraft qualifies as an aerodrome and drones have to stay 9km away. Float planes seem like they can make any body of water an aerodrome. The following is Transport Canada's legal definition of an aerodrome.

"aerodrome means any area of land, water (including the frozen surface thereof) or other supporting surface used, designed, prepared, equipped or set apart for use either in whole or in part for the arrival, departure, movement or servicing of aircraft and includes any buildings, installations and equipment situated thereon or associated therewith; (aérodrome)"

And the 75m rule for buildings/vehicles/people is lateral distance. Apparently there's no flying over something or someone at 90m and that includes willing spectators unless they're "associated" with the flyer.

"at a lateral distance of less than 250 feet (75m) from buildings, structures, vehicles, vessels, animals and the public including spectators, bystanders or any person not associated with the operation of the aircraft"

Fun times...
 
They need to get realistic. 5 km from any airport or heli pad and if you can see a plane or helicopter in air then land drone till danger passes. And I would not fly over people anyway. I fly about 150 from roads, I do cross them but now it feels like I have wasted $2000
Plus I like watching my 8 year old daughter fly it in beginner mode. She likes tripod mode. But now if some neibour is mad or a car passes and sees her fly or me fly then can call and I get upto $3000 fine.
e5fab3253584b335eabea6ceb146cc62.jpg


Family farm is 4 miles south of Port Perry so can't fly there either.

Steve, what's the source of this map?
 

DJI Drone Deals

New Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
134,608
Messages
1,596,759
Members
163,103
Latest member
thinkaerial
Want to Remove this Ad? Simply login or create a free account